PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MVUS.L vs. PQVM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MVUS.L vs. PQVM.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MVUS.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and PQVM.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - MVUS.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while PQVM.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MVUS.L returned 10.08%/yr vs 16.70%/yr for PQVM.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVUS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVM.L.

Performance

MVUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MVUS.L is traded in GBp, while PQVM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PQVM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVUS.L achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly lower than PQVM.L's 17.12% return.

MVUS.L

1D
0.22%
1M
4.90%
YTD
4.45%
6M
4.88%
1Y
12.53%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
10.08%
10Y*
11.39%

PQVM.L

1D
0.39%
1M
5.31%
YTD
17.12%
6M
16.98%
1Y
23.95%
3Y*
21.25%
5Y*
16.70%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVUS.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		4.45%3.88%20.71%3.83%-0.36%26.59%3.87%26.86%-0.36%7.79%
PQVM.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF		17.12%5.56%32.44%1.48%12.47%27.32%4.88%20.31%-1.48%13.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MVUS.L and PQVM.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017

0.75

The correlation between MVUS.L and PQVM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MVUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MVUS.L
PQVM.L

Technology

31.0%
25.6%

Financial Services

17.2%
22.0%

Healthcare

13.0%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

10.4%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
4.2%

Communication Services

6.2%
9.1%

Industrials

5.6%
13.7%

Energy

5.0%
5.6%

Utilities

2.7%
2.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
2.2%

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Technology

MVUS.L
31.0%
PQVM.L
25.6%

Financial Services

MVUS.L
17.2%
PQVM.L
22.0%

Healthcare

MVUS.L
13.0%
PQVM.L
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

MVUS.L
10.4%
PQVM.L
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

MVUS.L
6.7%
PQVM.L
4.2%

Communication Services

MVUS.L
6.2%
PQVM.L
9.1%

Industrials

MVUS.L
5.6%
PQVM.L
13.7%

Energy

MVUS.L
5.0%
PQVM.L
5.6%

Utilities

MVUS.L
2.7%
PQVM.L
2.8%

Basic Materials

MVUS.L
2.2%
PQVM.L
2.2%

Real Estate

MVUS.L
0.2%
PQVM.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF

Often compared with MVUS.L:
MVUS.L vs. USMVMVUS.L vs. XDEB.LMVUS.L vs. MVEA.LMVUS.L vs. GLTS.LMVUS.L vs. HMUD.LMVUS.L vs. XLPP.LMVUS.L vs. JURE.L
Often compared with PQVM.L:
PQVM.L vs. SPMOPQVM.L vs. VOOPQVM.L vs. UETW.DEPQVM.L vs. WEBN.DEPQVM.L vs. SPYL.LPQVM.L vs. SWDA.LPQVM.L vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

MVUS.L vs. PQVM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MVUS.L
MVUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MVUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
PQVM.L
PQVM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PQVM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQVM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQVM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PQVM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQVM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MVUS.LPQVM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.55
2.08

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.19
2.90

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

5.17

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.24

16.89

-9.65

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MVUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the PQVM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVUS.L and PQVM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MVUS.LPQVM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.08

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

1.06

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.85

+0.11

Drawdowns

MVUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVUS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, smaller than the maximum PQVM.L drawdown of -26.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVUS.L and PQVM.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MVUS.LPQVM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.85%

-26.48%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.39%

-4.61%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.19%

-17.12%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.19%

-17.12%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.85%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-4.22%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

1.41%

+0.32%

Volatility

MVUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) is 2.24%, while Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVM.L) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that MVUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQVM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MVUS.LPQVM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.24%

3.57%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.65%

9.05%

-3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

11.47%

-3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.72%

15.83%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.78%

17.14%

-3.36%

MVUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVM.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVUS.L vs. PQVM.L - Dividend Comparison

MVUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVUS.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PQVM.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF		0.77%0.82%0.84%1.58%1.79%0.89%1.48%1.38%1.68%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

MVUS.L and PQVM.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MVUS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVUS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVM.L.

MVUS.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while PQVM.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MVUS.L and 0.35% for PQVM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVUS.L and PQVM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer