MVUS.L vs. EWSP.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

MVUS.L (iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EWSP.L (iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds from iShares - MVUS.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while EWSP.L tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MVUS.L returned 11.71%/yr vs 12.19%/yr for EWSP.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

MVUS.L vs. EWSP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MVUS.L is traded in GBp, while EWSP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EWSP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVUS.L achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly lower than EWSP.L's 11.78% return.

MVUS.L

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: -0.20%
• 6M: 3.90%
• YTD: 4.26%
• 1Y: 10.17%
• 3Y*: 11.71%
• 5Y*: 8.80%
• 10Y*: 9.71%

EWSP.L

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.70%
• 6M: 7.82%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 1Y: 17.92%
• 3Y*: 12.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVUS.L vs. EWSP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MVUS.L iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	4.26%	3.88%	20.71%	3.83%	-1.45%
EWSP.L iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	11.78%	4.02%	13.96%	7.79%	-18.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MVUS.L and EWSP.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022	0.80

The correlation between MVUS.L and EWSP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

MVUS.L vs. EWSP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MVUS.L	EWSP.L
Technology	33.0%	20.9%
Financial Services	14.7%	13.9%
Healthcare	13.2%	11.1%
Consumer Defensive	9.3%	6.3%
Energy	7.2%	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	10.1%
Industrials	6.5%	14.2%
Communication Services	6.1%	3.9%
Basic Materials	2.1%	3.9%
Utilities	1.0%	5.7%
Real Estate	0.1%	6.1%

Return for Risk

MVUS.L vs. EWSP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVUS.L

MVUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
MVUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MVUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MVUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 43
MVUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
MVUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 45

EWSP.L

EWSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 74
EWSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
EWSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EWSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
EWSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EWSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVUS.L vs. EWSP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) and iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVUS.L	EWSP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.89	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	2.61	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.35	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	3.16	-1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.84	10.02	-4.18

MVUS.L vs. EWSP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the EWSP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVUS.L and EWSP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVUS.L vs. EWSP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVUS.L drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, which is greater than EWSP.L's maximum drawdown of -22.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVUS.L and EWSP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVUS.L	EWSP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.22%	-22.80%	-16.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.39%	-5.65%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.40%	-20.12%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-1.36%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-10.31%	+3.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	1.78%	-0.04%

Volatility

MVUS.L vs. EWSP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MVUS.L) is 2.28%, while iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that MVUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWSP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVUS.L	EWSP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.28%	2.83%	-0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.74%	6.71%	-0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.14%	9.63%	-1.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.32%	22.05%	-3.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.76%	22.05%	-5.29%

MVUS.L vs. EWSP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MVUS.L and EWSP.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MVUS.L vs. EWSP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MVUS.L nor EWSP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVUS.L and EWSP.L in my portfolio?

MVUS.L and EWSP.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MVUS.L or EWSP.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVUS.L or EWSP.L?

MVUS.L and EWSP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

What is the main difference between MVUS.L and EWSP.L?

MVUS.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while EWSP.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index.