PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MVR.AX vs. F100.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MVR.AX vs. F100.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

MVR.AX (VanEck Australian Resources ETF) and F100.AX (Betashares FTSE 100 ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MVR.AX tracks the VanEck Australian Resources Index while F100.AX tracks the FTSE 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MVR.AX returned 10.21%/yr vs 11.10%/yr for F100.AX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MVR.AX vs. F100.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in VanEck Australian Resources ETF (MVR.AX) and Betashares FTSE 100 ETF (F100.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVR.AX achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly higher than F100.AX's 1.78% return.

MVR.AX

1D
-1.18%
1M
-9.32%
6M
-1.96%
YTD
2.12%
1Y
32.17%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
13.27%

F100.AX

1D
0.40%
1M
1.45%
6M
0.85%
YTD
1.78%
1Y
11.20%
3Y*
14.72%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVR.AX vs. F100.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MVR.AX
VanEck Australian Resources ETF		2.12%40.54%-12.84%7.03%20.48%10.80%6.64%3.13%
F100.AX
Betashares FTSE 100 ETF		1.78%25.77%14.12%11.00%-1.20%21.76%-16.05%7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MVR.AX and F100.AX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2019

0.38

The correlation between MVR.AX and F100.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Australian Resources ETF

Betashares FTSE 100 ETF

Return for Risk

MVR.AX vs. F100.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MVR.AX
MVR.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MVR.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVR.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVR.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MVR.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVR.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
F100.AX
F100.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
F100.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
F100.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
F100.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
F100.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
F100.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVR.AX vs. F100.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Australian Resources ETF (MVR.AX) and Betashares FTSE 100 ETF (F100.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MVR.AXF100.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.41
1.04

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.94
1.55

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

1.33

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

4.00

+2.81

MVR.AX vs. F100.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVR.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the F100.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVR.AX and F100.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVR.AX vs. F100.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVR.AX drawdown since its inception was -38.96%, which is greater than F100.AX's maximum drawdown of -31.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVR.AX and F100.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MVR.AXF100.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.96%

-31.78%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-8.92%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.78%

-8.92%

-13.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.78%

-19.00%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.96%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.81%

-1.44%

-10.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-5.91%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.77%

3.00%

+1.77%

Volatility

MVR.AX vs. F100.AX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Australian Resources ETF (MVR.AX) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Betashares FTSE 100 ETF (F100.AX) at 3.14%. This indicates that MVR.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than F100.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MVR.AXF100.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

3.14%

+2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.70%

9.64%

+9.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.83%

11.48%

+11.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.21%

12.72%

+8.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.86%

14.90%

+5.96%

Dividends

MVR.AX vs. F100.AX - Dividend Comparison

MVR.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than F100.AX's 2.25% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
F100.AX
Betashares FTSE 100 ETF		2.25%3.09%1.91%1.57%1.62%2.13%2.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MVR.AX
VanEck Australian Resources ETF		1.26%2.86%3.19%2.55%3.82%5.27%6.18%4.25%0.77%2.03%3.12%1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

MVR.AX and F100.AX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVR.AX tracks VanEck Australian Resources Index, while F100.AX tracks FTSE 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BetaShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVR.AX and F100.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer