PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MVR.AX vs. CETF.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MVR.AX vs. CETF.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

MVR.AX (VanEck Australian Resources ETF) and CETF.AX (VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVR.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the VanEck Australian Resources Index, while CETF.AX is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China A50 Net Tax AUD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MVR.AX returned 13.27%/yr vs 5.29%/yr for CETF.AX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MVR.AX vs. CETF.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in VanEck Australian Resources ETF (MVR.AX) and VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF (CETF.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVR.AX achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly higher than CETF.AX's -0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, MVR.AX has outperformed CETF.AX with an annualized return of 13.27%, while CETF.AX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.29% annualized return.

MVR.AX

1D
-1.18%
1M
-9.32%
6M
-1.96%
YTD
2.12%
1Y
32.17%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
13.27%

CETF.AX

1D
-1.86%
1M
-1.13%
6M
-2.24%
YTD
-0.98%
1Y
11.65%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*
5.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVR.AX vs. CETF.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVR.AX
VanEck Australian Resources ETF		2.12%40.54%-12.84%7.03%20.48%10.80%6.64%32.92%-2.71%28.94%
CETF.AX
VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF		-0.98%12.88%30.64%-13.18%-16.50%-1.23%18.52%33.28%-18.45%21.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MVR.AX and CETF.AX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2015

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Australian Resources ETF

VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF

Return for Risk

MVR.AX vs. CETF.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MVR.AX
MVR.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MVR.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVR.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVR.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MVR.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVR.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
CETF.AX
CETF.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CETF.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CETF.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CETF.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CETF.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CETF.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVR.AX vs. CETF.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Australian Resources ETF (MVR.AX) and VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF (CETF.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

MVR.AXCETF.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.41
0.76

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.94
1.11

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.14

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

0.97

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

2.38

+4.43

MVR.AX vs. CETF.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVR.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the CETF.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVR.AX and CETF.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVR.AX vs. CETF.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVR.AX drawdown since its inception was -38.96%, smaller than the maximum CETF.AX drawdown of -41.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVR.AX and CETF.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MVR.AXCETF.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.96%

-41.32%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-12.01%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.78%

-19.05%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.78%

-33.90%

+11.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.96%

-40.95%

+1.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.81%

-11.36%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-23.78%

+16.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.77%

4.95%

-0.18%

Volatility

MVR.AX vs. CETF.AX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Australian Resources ETF (MVR.AX) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF (CETF.AX) at 5.19%. This indicates that MVR.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CETF.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MVR.AXCETF.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

5.19%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.70%

11.75%

+6.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.83%

15.18%

+7.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.21%

19.75%

+1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.86%

20.06%

+0.80%

Dividends

MVR.AX vs. CETF.AX - Dividend Comparison

MVR.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than CETF.AX's 1.87% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CETF.AX
VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF		1.87%1.94%1.55%2.94%2.80%1.80%1.30%1.28%11.56%1.08%1.16%3.19%
MVR.AX
VanEck Australian Resources ETF		1.26%2.86%3.19%2.55%3.82%5.27%6.18%4.25%0.77%2.03%3.12%1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

MVR.AX and CETF.AX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVR.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while CETF.AX is China Equities. MVR.AX tracks VanEck Australian Resources Index, while CETF.AX tracks FTSE China A50 Net Tax AUD Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVR.AX and CETF.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer