MVPL vs. ADBG

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

MVPL (Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF) and ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MVPL returned 43.46% vs -71.70% for ADBG. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MVPL charges 1.72%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ADBG.

Performance

MVPL vs. ADBG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF (MVPL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVPL achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly higher than ADBG's -54.70% return.

MVPL

• 1D: -5.03%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 14.20%
• 6M: 13.45%
• 1Y: 43.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ADBG

• 1D: -5.32%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: -54.70%
• 6M: -54.25%
• 1Y: -71.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVPL vs. ADBG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MVPL Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF	14.20%	35.19%
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF	-54.70%	-30.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MVPL and ADBG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

MVPL vs. ADBG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVPL

MVPL Risk / Return Rank: 65
MVPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
MVPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
MVPL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
MVPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
MVPL Martin Ratio Rank: 67

ADBG

ADBG Risk / Return Rank: 1
ADBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Omega Ratio Rank: 0
ADBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVPL vs. ADBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF (MVPL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MVPL	ADBG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	-1.07	+3.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	-1.98	+4.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.77	+0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	-0.94	+4.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.50	-1.42	+12.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MVPL vs. ADBG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the ADBG Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVPL and ADBG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MVPL	ADBG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	-1.07	+3.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.16	-0.93	+2.08

Drawdowns

MVPL vs. ADBG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVPL drawdown since its inception was -25.68%, smaller than the maximum ADBG drawdown of -76.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVPL and ADBG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVPL	ADBG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.68%	-76.71%	+51.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.68%	-76.23%	+63.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.61%	-72.49%	+66.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-41.84%	+37.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.79%	50.52%	-46.73%

Volatility

MVPL vs. ADBG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF (MVPL) is 7.41%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) has a volatility of 27.94%. This indicates that MVPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADBG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVPL	ADBG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.41%	27.94%	-20.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.00%	56.40%	-40.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.88%	67.29%	-45.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.24%	66.90%	-41.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.24%	66.90%	-41.66%

MVPL vs. ADBG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVPL has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than ADBG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVPL vs. ADBG - Dividend Comparison

MVPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while ADBG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MVPL Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF	0.96%	1.10%	7.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVPL and ADBG in my portfolio?

MVPL and ADBG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVPL or ADBG?

ADBG has higher volatility (27.94%) compared to MVPL (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVPL dropped -25.68% vs ADBG's -76.71%.

Which ETF is better, MVPL or ADBG?

On 1-year performance, MVPL leads with 43.46% vs -71.70% for ADBG. On fees, ADBG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MVPL has been the lower-risk option at 7.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVPL or ADBG?

Over the 1-year period, MVPL has performed better with a 43.46% return vs -71.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVPL or ADBG?

ADBG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.72% for MVPL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVPL or ADBG?

MVPL has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.00% for ADBG.

What is the main difference between MVPL and ADBG?

They also come from different issuers: Miller and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.72% for MVPL and 0.75% for ADBG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.