PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVOL.L vs. UBU5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVOL.L vs. UBU5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBU5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MVOL.L is traded in USD, while UBU5.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UBU5.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVOL.L achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than UBU5.DE's 11.22% return. Over the past 10 years, MVOL.L has underperformed UBU5.DE with an annualized return of 6.83%, while UBU5.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.09% annualized return.


MVOL.L

1D
0.65%
1M
3.64%
6M
2.88%
YTD
2.60%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
9.17%
5Y*
5.10%
10Y*
6.83%

UBU5.DE

1D
-0.31%
1M
2.34%
6M
8.30%
YTD
11.22%
1Y
19.14%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVOL.L vs. UBU5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS
2.60%11.02%11.08%7.28%-9.62%14.65%2.56%22.56%-2.40%17.39%
UBU5.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
11.22%14.32%13.25%8.80%-6.90%27.91%-0.83%25.52%-8.73%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MVOL.L and UBU5.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.70

The correlation between MVOL.L and UBU5.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVOL.L vs. UBU5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVOL.L
MVOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

UBU5.DE
UBU5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
UBU5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBU5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBU5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
UBU5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBU5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVOL.L vs. UBU5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBU5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MVOL.LUBU5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.35

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

2.85

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.76

10.95

-9.19

MVOL.L vs. UBU5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the UBU5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVOL.L and UBU5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVOL.L vs. UBU5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVOL.L drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, smaller than the maximum UBU5.DE drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVOL.L and UBU5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVOL.LUBU5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.82%

-37.08%

+8.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

-6.66%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.15%

-16.85%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-17.95%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.82%

-37.08%

+8.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-0.31%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-5.16%

+1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

1.74%

+0.91%

Volatility

MVOL.L vs. UBU5.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) has a higher volatility of 2.29% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBU5.DE) at 1.64%. This indicates that MVOL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBU5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVOL.LUBU5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

1.64%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

6.75%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.87%

9.62%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.67%

13.94%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.62%

15.57%

-3.95%

MVOL.L vs. UBU5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVOL.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than UBU5.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVOL.L vs. UBU5.DE - Dividend Comparison

MVOL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UBU5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBU5.DE
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.35%2.11%1.74%2.03%1.92%1.52%2.49%1.97%2.53%2.04%2.32%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVOL.L and UBU5.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UBU5.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UBU5.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MVOL.L.

MVOL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while UBU5.DE is Large Cap Value Equities. MVOL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while UBU5.DE tracks MSCI USA Value. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MVOL.L and 0.20% for UBU5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVOL.L and UBU5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer