MVOL.L vs. SPQH.DE
MVOL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS) and SPQH.DE (Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Tail Hedge UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - MVOL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SPQH.DE is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 9% (-3% to -12%) Buffer Protect Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MVOL.L returned 9.30%/yr vs 8.82%/yr for SPQH.DE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MVOL.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPQH.DE.
Performance
MVOL.L vs. SPQH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MVOL.L is traded in USD, while SPQH.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SPQH.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVOL.L achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly higher than SPQH.DE's 0.35% return.
MVOL.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 1.44%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- 5.18%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
SPQH.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 8.55%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVOL.L vs. SPQH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MVOL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS | 0.67% | 11.02% | 11.08% | 8.34% |
SPQH.DE Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Tail Hedge UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.35% | 7.92% | 14.91% | 11.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVOL.L and SPQH.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023 | 0.33 |
The correlation between MVOL.L and SPQH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVOL.L vs. SPQH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
MVOL.L
SPQH.DE
MVOL.L vs. SPQH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) and Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Tail Hedge UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SPQH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVOL.L | SPQH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.24 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.87 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.61 | 7.05 | -6.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVOL.L | SPQH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 1.33 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 1.08 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
MVOL.L vs. SPQH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVOL.L drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, which is greater than SPQH.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVOL.L and SPQH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVOL.L | SPQH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -13.33% | -15.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.78% | -4.56% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.14% | -13.33% | +5.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.86% | -0.41% | -3.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -1.26% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 1.21% | +1.15% |
Volatility
MVOL.L vs. SPQH.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) has a higher volatility of 2.01% compared to Global X S&P 500 Quarterly Tail Hedge UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SPQH.DE) at 1.36%. This indicates that MVOL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPQH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVOL.L | SPQH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.01% | 1.36% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.58% | 4.60% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.74% | 6.39% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.64% | 9.65% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.65% | 9.65% | +2.00% |
MVOL.L vs. SPQH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVOL.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SPQH.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVOL.L vs. SPQH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither MVOL.L nor SPQH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MVOL.L and SPQH.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MVOL.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MVOL.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPQH.DE.
MVOL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SPQH.DE is Defined Outcome. MVOL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SPQH.DE tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% WHT Quarterly 9% (-3% to -12%) Buffer Protect Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MVOL.L and 0.50% for SPQH.DE.
Find the right allocation for MVOL.L and SPQH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer