PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MVOL.L vs. SMGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MVOL.L vs. SMGB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MVOL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS) and SMGB.L (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVOL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SMGB.L is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MVOL.L returned 5.18%/yr vs 36.94%/yr for SMGB.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

MVOL.L vs. SMGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MVOL.L is traded in USD, while SMGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SMGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVOL.L achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than SMGB.L's 85.03% return.

MVOL.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.76%
YTD
0.67%
6M
1.44%
1Y
1.44%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
7.05%

SMGB.L

1D
-2.44%
1M
22.44%
YTD
85.03%
6M
86.05%
1Y
171.14%
3Y*
61.20%
5Y*
36.94%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVOL.L vs. SMGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS		0.67%11.02%11.08%7.28%-9.62%14.65%1.02%
SMGB.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF		85.03%49.26%24.20%74.93%-35.24%43.10%3.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MVOL.L and SMGB.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.37

The correlation between MVOL.L and SMGB.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MVOL.L vs. SMGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
MVOL.L
SMGB.L

Technology

20.1%
100.0%

Financial Services

14.0%

-

Healthcare

13.8%

-

Communication Services

12.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.9%

-

Industrials

9.2%

-

Utilities

8.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%

-

Energy

4.5%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

MVOL.L
20.1%
SMGB.L
100.0%

Financial Services

MVOL.L
14.0%
SMGB.L

-

Healthcare

MVOL.L
13.8%
SMGB.L

-

Communication Services

MVOL.L
12.1%
SMGB.L

-

Consumer Defensive

MVOL.L
10.9%
SMGB.L

-

Industrials

MVOL.L
9.2%
SMGB.L

-

Utilities

MVOL.L
8.0%
SMGB.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

MVOL.L
5.6%
SMGB.L

-

Energy

MVOL.L
4.5%
SMGB.L

-

Basic Materials

MVOL.L
1.1%
SMGB.L

-

Real Estate

MVOL.L
0.7%
SMGB.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS

VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF

Often compared with MVOL.L:
MVOL.L vs. ACWVMVOL.L vs. IWDA.LMVOL.L vs. XDEB.DEMVOL.L vs. VOOMVOL.L vs. XDEM.LMVOL.L vs. USMVMVOL.L vs. SLXX.L
Often compared with SMGB.L:
SMGB.L vs. SEMISMGB.L vs. IITU.LSMGB.L vs. SOXXSMGB.L vs. EQQQ.DESMGB.L vs. HNSS.LSMGB.L vs. AIAG.LSMGB.L vs. XLKQ.L

Return for Risk

MVOL.L vs. SMGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
MVOL.L
MVOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
SMGB.L
SMGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVOL.L vs. SMGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

MVOL.LSMGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.19
5.32

-5.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.31
5.55

-5.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.70

-0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

12.00

-11.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.61

44.83

-44.22

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MVOL.L vs. SMGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the SMGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 5.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVOL.L and SMGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

MVOL.LSMGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

5.32

-5.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

1.15

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.18

-0.45

Drawdowns

MVOL.L vs. SMGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVOL.L drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, smaller than the maximum SMGB.L drawdown of -45.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVOL.L and SMGB.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

MVOL.LSMGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.82%

-45.71%

+16.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

-14.18%

+8.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.14%

-36.86%

+28.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-45.71%

+27.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.82%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.86%

-2.44%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.34%

-11.23%

+7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

3.80%

-1.44%

Volatility

MVOL.L vs. SMGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) is 2.01%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMGB.L) has a volatility of 12.88%. This indicates that MVOL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

MVOL.LSMGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

12.88%

-10.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.58%

25.13%

-19.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.74%

32.00%

-24.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.64%

32.13%

-21.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.65%

31.85%

-20.20%

MVOL.L vs. SMGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MVOL.L and SMGB.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

MVOL.L vs. SMGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MVOL.L nor SMGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMGB.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

MVOL.L and SMGB.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVOL.L and SMGB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

MVOL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SMGB.L is Semiconductors. MVOL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SMGB.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVOL.L and SMGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer