MVLL vs. DOGG

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) and DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVLL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL), while DOGG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest. MVLL is passively managed, while DOGG is actively managed. Over the past year, MVLL returned 416.44% vs 17.76% for DOGG. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. MVLL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DOGG.

Performance

MVLL vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVLL achieves a 381.49% return, which is significantly higher than DOGG's 8.91% return.

MVLL

• 1D: -6.32%
• 1M: -35.60%
• 6M: 406.60%
• YTD: 381.49%
• 1Y: 416.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DOGG

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -0.46%
• 6M: 8.28%
• YTD: 8.91%
• 1Y: 17.76%
• 3Y*: 12.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVLL vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	381.49%	-8.44%
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	8.91%	7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MVLL and DOGG is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

MVLL vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVLL

MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 90
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 85
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

DOGG

DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 52
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVLL vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVLL	DOGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	1.57	+1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	2.28	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.27	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.44	2.08	+5.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.04	4.48	+11.57

MVLL vs. DOGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVLL Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the DOGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVLL and DOGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVLL vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVLL drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, which is greater than DOGG's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVLL and DOGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVLL	DOGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.02%	-11.19%	-47.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.06%	-8.29%	-46.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.36%	-4.27%	-49.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.09%	-3.27%	-19.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.49%	3.86%	+21.63%

Volatility

MVLL vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a higher volatility of 62.41% compared to FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) at 4.17%. This indicates that MVLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVLL	DOGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	62.41%	4.17%	+58.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	119.75%	8.77%	+110.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	148.83%	11.01%	+137.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	148.62%	12.99%	+135.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	148.62%	12.99%	+135.63%

MVLL vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVLL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVLL vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison

MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	8.69%	8.75%	9.92%	5.89%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVLL and DOGG in my portfolio?

MVLL and DOGG have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVLL or DOGG?

MVLL has higher volatility (62.41%) compared to DOGG (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVLL dropped -59.02% vs DOGG's -11.19%.

Which ETF is better, MVLL or DOGG?

On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 416.44% vs 17.76% for DOGG. On fees, DOGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DOGG has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVLL or DOGG?

Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 416.44% return vs 17.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVLL or DOGG?

DOGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVLL or DOGG?

DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.69%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.

What is the main difference between MVLL and DOGG?

MVLL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DOGG is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MVLL and 0.75% for DOGG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.