MVEW.L vs. PACW.L
MVEW.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)) and PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) are both Global Equities funds - MVEW.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while PACW.L tracks the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MVEW.L returned 3.27% vs 30.29% for PACW.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MVEW.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PACW.L.
Performance
MVEW.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVEW.L achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than PACW.L's 11.92% return.
MVEW.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 3.27%
- 3Y*
- 6.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- —
PACW.L
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 12.31%
- 1Y
- 30.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVEW.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MVEW.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.37% | -0.13% |
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income | 11.92% | 9.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVEW.L and PACW.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVEW.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank
MVEW.L
PACW.L
MVEW.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVEW.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.55 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 4.27 | -3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.47 | 17.43 | -15.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVEW.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 2.89 | -2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.24 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
MVEW.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVEW.L drawdown since its inception was -10.07%, smaller than the maximum PACW.L drawdown of -17.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVEW.L and PACW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVEW.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.07% | -17.68% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.85% | -7.06% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.02% | -0.46% | -2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -3.02% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 1.73% | +0.49% |
Volatility
MVEW.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) is 2.63%, while Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that MVEW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVEW.L | PACW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.93% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.97% | 7.75% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.00% | 10.42% | -2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.78% | 13.91% | -4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 13.91% | -3.83% |
MVEW.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVEW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVEW.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison
MVEW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
MVEW.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% |
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVEW.L and PACW.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MVEW.L.
MVEW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MVEW.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.
Find the right allocation for MVEW.L and PACW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer