PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVEW.L vs. MWEP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVEW.L vs. MWEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) and Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MVEW.L is traded in GBP, while MWEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MWEP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVEW.L achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than MWEP.L's 8.08% return.


MVEW.L

1D
0.20%
1M
2.18%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.12%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*

MWEP.L

1D
0.39%
1M
2.47%
YTD
8.08%
6M
8.60%
1Y
19.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVEW.L vs. MWEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MVEW.L and MWEP.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.60

The correlation between MVEW.L and MWEP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVEW.L vs. MWEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVEW.L
MVEW.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

MWEP.L
MWEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MWEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MWEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVEW.L vs. MWEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) and Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVEW.LMWEP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.35

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

2.58

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

10.16

-8.70

MVEW.L vs. MWEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the MWEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVEW.L and MWEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVEW.LMWEP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

1.93

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.28

-0.68

Drawdowns

MVEW.L vs. MWEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVEW.L drawdown since its inception was -10.07%, smaller than the maximum MWEP.L drawdown of -14.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVEW.L and MWEP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVEW.LMWEP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-14.02%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.85%

-7.71%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-0.27%

-2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-1.89%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

1.96%

+0.26%

Volatility

MVEW.L vs. MWEP.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) and Invesco MSCI World Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (MWEP.L) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVEW.LMWEP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.63%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

8.36%

-2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.00%

10.30%

-2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.78%

12.14%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.08%

12.14%

-2.06%

MVEW.L vs. MWEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVEW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MWEP.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVEW.L vs. MWEP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MVEW.L nor MWEP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MVEW.L and MWEP.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWEP.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWEP.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MVEW.L.

MVEW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while MWEP.L tracks MSCI World Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MVEW.L and 0.20% for MWEP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVEW.L and MWEP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer