MVEW.L vs. CSP1.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MVEW.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVEW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MVEW.L returned 6.63%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for CSP1.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVEW.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.

Performance

MVEW.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MVEW.L is traded in GBP, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVEW.L achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.55% return.

MVEW.L

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 0.14%
• 1Y: 3.27%
• 3Y*: 6.64%
• 5Y*: 6.63%
• 10Y*: —

CSP1.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 5.54%
• YTD: 10.55%
• 6M: 10.48%
• 1Y: 29.13%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: 14.94%
• 10Y*: 16.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVEW.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MVEW.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.37%	3.73%	12.44%	4.00%	-0.60%	18.17%	-1.61%
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF	10.55%	9.37%	27.35%	19.79%	-9.05%	31.07%	7.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MVEW.L and CSP1.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2020	0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between MVEW.L and CSP1.L has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MVEW.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MVEW.L	CSP1.L
Technology	22.6%	38.0%
Financial Services	15.2%	11.3%
Healthcare	14.9%	8.4%
Communication Services	10.5%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	10.2%	4.7%
Industrials	8.2%	7.9%
Utilities	6.7%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	9.9%
Energy	3.3%	3.4%
Basic Materials	1.5%	1.7%
Real Estate	1.4%	1.9%

Return for Risk

MVEW.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVEW.L

MVEW.L Risk / Return Rank: 15
MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
MVEW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
MVEW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 14
MVEW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
MVEW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 16

CSP1.L

CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVEW.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MVEW.L	CSP1.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	2.73	-2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	3.66	-3.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.51	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	4.07	-3.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.47	14.99	-13.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MVEW.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVEW.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MVEW.L	CSP1.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41	2.73	-2.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	1.04	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	1.09	-0.49

Drawdowns

MVEW.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVEW.L drawdown since its inception was -10.07%, smaller than the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVEW.L and CSP1.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVEW.L	CSP1.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.07%	-25.48%	+15.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.85%	-7.12%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.04%	-20.77%	+11.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.07%	-20.77%	+10.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	-0.24%	-2.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.57%	-3.32%	+0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	1.94%	+0.28%

Volatility

MVEW.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVEW.L	CSP1.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	2.62%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.97%	7.16%	-1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.00%	10.62%	-2.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.78%	14.31%	-4.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.08%	15.57%	-5.49%

MVEW.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVEW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVEW.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MVEW.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVEW.L and CSP1.L in my portfolio?

MVEW.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MVEW.L or CSP1.L?

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVEW.L or CSP1.L?

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MVEW.L.

What is the main difference between MVEW.L and CSP1.L?

MVEW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. MVEW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MVEW.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.