PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVEW.L vs. BATG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVEW.L vs. BATG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MVEW.L is traded in GBP, while BATG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BATG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVEW.L achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than BATG.L's 34.23% return.


MVEW.L

1D
0.20%
1M
1.97%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.14%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*

BATG.L

1D
-2.48%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
34.23%
6M
39.36%
1Y
129.36%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
17.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVEW.L vs. BATG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MVEW.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.37%3.73%12.44%4.00%-0.60%18.17%-1.61%
BATG.L
L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF
34.23%60.42%0.47%2.83%-3.91%17.00%46.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MVEW.L and BATG.L is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2020

0.32

The correlation between MVEW.L and BATG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MVEW.L vs. BATG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MVEW.L
BATG.L

Technology

22.6%
17.6%

Financial Services

15.2%

-

Healthcare

14.9%

-

Communication Services

10.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.2%

-

Industrials

8.2%
31.2%

Utilities

6.7%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
20.1%

Energy

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%
24.4%

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Technology

MVEW.L
22.6%
BATG.L
17.6%

Financial Services

MVEW.L
15.2%
BATG.L

-

Healthcare

MVEW.L
14.9%
BATG.L

-

Communication Services

MVEW.L
10.5%
BATG.L

-

Consumer Defensive

MVEW.L
10.2%
BATG.L

-

Industrials

MVEW.L
8.2%
BATG.L
31.2%

Utilities

MVEW.L
6.7%
BATG.L
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MVEW.L
5.4%
BATG.L
20.1%

Energy

MVEW.L
3.3%
BATG.L

-

Basic Materials

MVEW.L
1.5%
BATG.L
24.4%

Real Estate

MVEW.L
1.4%
BATG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVEW.L vs. BATG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVEW.L
MVEW.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

BATG.L
BATG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BATG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BATG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVEW.L vs. BATG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVEW.LBATG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.66

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

9.45

-8.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

32.41

-30.95

MVEW.L vs. BATG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the BATG.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVEW.L and BATG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVEW.LBATG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

4.61

-4.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.77

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.80

-0.20

Drawdowns

MVEW.L vs. BATG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVEW.L drawdown since its inception was -10.07%, smaller than the maximum BATG.L drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVEW.L and BATG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVEW.LBATG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-33.37%

+23.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.85%

-13.61%

+7.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.04%

-33.37%

+24.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.07%

-33.37%

+23.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-4.18%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-8.99%

+6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

3.98%

-1.76%

Volatility

MVEW.L vs. BATG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) is 2.63%, while L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that MVEW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVEW.LBATG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

10.12%

-7.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

22.09%

-16.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.00%

27.90%

-19.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.78%

22.54%

-12.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.08%

22.86%

-12.78%

MVEW.L vs. BATG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVEW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BATG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVEW.L vs. BATG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MVEW.L nor BATG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MVEW.L and BATG.L have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MVEW.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVEW.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BATG.L.

MVEW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BATG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. MVEW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while BATG.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MVEW.L and 0.49% for BATG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVEW.L and BATG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer