PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVED.L vs. XDDX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVED.L vs. XDDX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (MVED.L) and Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MVED.L is traded in EUR, while XDDX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDDX.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MVED.L having a 4.65% return and XDDX.L slightly lower at 4.56%.


MVED.L

1D
0.33%
1M
0.58%
YTD
4.65%
6M
5.79%
1Y
2.49%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*

XDDX.L

1D
0.26%
1M
3.35%
YTD
4.56%
6M
6.62%
1Y
5.77%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVED.L vs. XDDX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MVED.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
4.65%8.77%8.89%10.72%-12.60%21.51%-3.86%22.67%-1.16%
XDDX.L
Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
4.56%18.30%16.65%19.52%-13.20%14.87%3.45%23.82%-14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MVED.L and XDDX.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2018

0.73

The correlation between MVED.L and XDDX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MVED.L vs. XDDX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MVED.L
XDDX.L

Financial Services

17.8%
29.9%

Industrials

15.7%
18.3%

Consumer Defensive

13.2%
1.5%

Healthcare

13.1%
5.3%

Utilities

10.1%

-

Communication Services

9.5%
8.7%

Energy

6.9%

-

Basic Materials

5.7%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
11.0%

Technology

2.8%
15.4%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.5%

Financial Services

MVED.L
17.8%
XDDX.L
29.9%

Industrials

MVED.L
15.7%
XDDX.L
18.3%

Consumer Defensive

MVED.L
13.2%
XDDX.L
1.5%

Healthcare

MVED.L
13.1%
XDDX.L
5.3%

Utilities

MVED.L
10.1%
XDDX.L

-

Communication Services

MVED.L
9.5%
XDDX.L
8.7%

Energy

MVED.L
6.9%
XDDX.L

-

Basic Materials

MVED.L
5.7%
XDDX.L
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MVED.L
3.7%
XDDX.L
11.0%

Technology

MVED.L
2.8%
XDDX.L
15.4%

Real Estate

MVED.L
1.6%
XDDX.L
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVED.L vs. XDDX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVED.L
MVED.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MVED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MVED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

XDDX.L
XDDX.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XDDX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDDX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDDX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XDDX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDDX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVED.L vs. XDDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (MVED.L) and Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVED.LXDDX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.08

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

0.49

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.78

1.36

-0.58

MVED.L vs. XDDX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVED.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is comparable to the XDDX.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVED.L and XDDX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVED.LXDDX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

0.38

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.50

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.44

+0.08

Drawdowns

MVED.L vs. XDDX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVED.L drawdown since its inception was -30.56%, smaller than the maximum XDDX.L drawdown of -39.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVED.L and XDDX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVED.LXDDX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.56%

-39.26%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-12.10%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.51%

-16.43%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

-27.09%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.11%

-1.41%

-2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-7.46%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

4.33%

-1.15%

Volatility

MVED.L vs. XDDX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (MVED.L) is 2.93%, while Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDDX.L) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that MVED.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDDX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVED.LXDDX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

4.46%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

11.96%

-4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.78%

15.51%

-6.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.99%

17.11%

-6.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.63%

18.47%

-5.84%

MVED.L vs. XDDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVED.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XDDX.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MVED.L vs. XDDX.L - Dividend Comparison

MVED.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDDX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MVED.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.67%2.95%2.16%2.54%2.81%2.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDDX.L
Xtrackers DAX ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
2.30%2.39%2.75%3.30%5.08%2.13%3.09%2.87%2.26%2.08%1.31%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVED.L and XDDX.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDDX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDDX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MVED.L.

MVED.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while XDDX.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MVED.L and 0.09% for XDDX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVED.L and XDDX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer