PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVEA.DE vs. GMVM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVEA.DE vs. GMVM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.DE) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GMVM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVEA.DE achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than GMVM.DE's -1.57% return.


MVEA.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.15%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.17%
1Y
1.20%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*

GMVM.DE

1D
0.97%
1M
2.94%
YTD
-1.57%
6M
-3.00%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVEA.DE vs. GMVM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MVEA.DE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF
2.43%-7.09%19.73%8.74%-6.83%34.90%5.86%
GMVM.DE
VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF
-1.57%-4.56%17.59%14.37%-14.38%36.91%15.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MVEA.DE and GMVM.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.80

The correlation between MVEA.DE and GMVM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVEA.DE vs. GMVM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVEA.DE
MVEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MVEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GMVM.DE
GMVM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GMVM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMVM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMVM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GMVM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMVM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVEA.DE vs. GMVM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.DE) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GMVM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVEA.DEGMVM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.09

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

0.58

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.35

1.37

-1.02

MVEA.DE vs. GMVM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVEA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the GMVM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVEA.DE and GMVM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVEA.DEGMVM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

0.48

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.27

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.62

+0.05

Drawdowns

MVEA.DE vs. GMVM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.47%, smaller than the maximum GMVM.DE drawdown of -32.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVEA.DE and GMVM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVEA.DEGMVM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-32.25%

+14.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.92%

-11.00%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.47%

-25.74%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.47%

-25.74%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.27%

-10.18%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-5.85%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

4.69%

-2.30%

Volatility

MVEA.DE vs. GMVM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI USA Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (MVEA.DE) is 2.72%, while VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (GMVM.DE) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that MVEA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMVM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVEA.DEGMVM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

3.23%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

8.82%

-2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.97%

13.33%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.27%

15.26%

-2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.79%

16.54%

-3.75%

MVEA.DE vs. GMVM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVEA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GMVM.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVEA.DE vs. GMVM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MVEA.DE nor GMVM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MVEA.DE and GMVM.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MVEA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GMVM.DE.

MVEA.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while GMVM.DE tracks Morningstar US Sustainable Moat Focus. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MVEA.DE and 0.49% for GMVM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVEA.DE and GMVM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer