PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUOIX vs. YFSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUOIX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio (MUOIX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUOIX achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 27.94% return.


MUOIX

1D
-0.97%
1M
2.93%
YTD
3.97%
6M
4.00%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*

YFSIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.24%
YTD
27.94%
6M
15.38%
1Y
32.86%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUOIX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUOIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio
3.97%16.48%28.61%18.07%-20.21%35.99%24.20%36.01%-11.00%17.32%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
27.94%14.91%-0.34%16.64%-9.15%13.13%18.46%24.40%2.18%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between MUOIX and YFSIX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between MUOIX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUOIX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUOIX
MUOIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MUOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MUOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSIX
YFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
YFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUOIX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio (MUOIX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUOIXYFSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

1.54

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

1.70

+0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.31

-1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.71

7.30

-2.59

MUOIX vs. YFSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUOIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the YFSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUOIX and YFSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUOIXYFSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.54

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.59

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.82

-0.10

Drawdowns

MUOIX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUOIX drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUOIX and YFSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUOIXYFSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-35.10%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-14.20%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.60%

-14.20%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.92%

-25.14%

+0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.24%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-4.90%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

4.47%

-0.75%

Volatility

MUOIX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio (MUOIX) is 3.21%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that MUOIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUOIXYFSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

5.82%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

20.77%

-10.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

21.35%

-8.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.01%

15.39%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

16.25%

+3.89%

MUOIX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUOIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUOIX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MUOIX nor YFSIX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUOIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.32%0.21%0.04%0.30%1.35%1.50%0.49%
YFSIX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund
0.00%0.00%8.68%8.02%4.32%8.18%4.76%6.59%0.71%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUOIX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSIX has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to MUOIX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUOIX dropped -38.35% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.

YFSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUOIX and YFSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer