PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUOIX vs. TANDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUOIX vs. TANDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio (MUOIX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUOIX achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly higher than TANDX's -13.18% return.


MUOIX

1D
-0.97%
1M
2.93%
YTD
3.97%
6M
4.00%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
21.11%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*

TANDX

1D
-0.91%
1M
-3.85%
YTD
-13.18%
6M
-13.13%
1Y
-15.71%
3Y*
1.15%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUOIX vs. TANDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MUOIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio
3.97%16.48%28.61%18.07%-20.21%35.99%24.20%21.40%
TANDX
Castle Tandem Fund
-13.18%3.67%7.66%8.42%-7.87%19.03%13.39%12.57%

Correlation

The correlation between MUOIX and TANDX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between MUOIX and TANDX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUOIX vs. TANDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUOIX
MUOIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MUOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MUOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

TANDX
TANDX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
TANDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TANDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
TANDX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
TANDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
TANDX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUOIX vs. TANDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio (MUOIX) and Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUOIXTANDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

-1.70

+3.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

-2.29

+4.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.74

+0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

-0.98

+2.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.71

-2.30

+7.01

MUOIX vs. TANDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUOIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the TANDX Sharpe Ratio of -1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUOIX and TANDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUOIXTANDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

-1.70

+3.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.00

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.01

+0.70

Drawdowns

MUOIX vs. TANDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUOIX drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum TANDX drawdown of -93.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUOIX and TANDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUOIXTANDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.35%

-93.93%

+55.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.75%

-16.13%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.60%

-93.93%

+75.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.92%

-93.93%

+69.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-93.93%

+92.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-20.25%

+14.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

6.85%

-3.13%

Volatility

MUOIX vs. TANDX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio (MUOIX) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Castle Tandem Fund (TANDX) at 2.52%. This indicates that MUOIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TANDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUOIXTANDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

2.52%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

7.18%

+2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

9.26%

+3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.01%

595.57%

-577.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

496.55%

-476.41%

MUOIX vs. TANDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUOIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than TANDX's 1.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUOIX vs. TANDX - Dividend Comparison

MUOIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TANDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUOIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.32%0.21%0.04%0.30%1.35%1.50%0.49%
TANDX
Castle Tandem Fund
7.11%6.17%3.71%2.10%1.48%4.57%0.33%0.37%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUOIX and TANDX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUOIX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to TANDX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUOIX dropped -38.35% vs TANDX's -93.93%.

MUOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUOIX and TANDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer