MUOIX vs. FLCPX

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

MUOIX (Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio) and FLCPX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MUOIX returned 10.71%/yr vs 13.05%/yr for FLCPX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MUOIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FLCPX.

Performance

MUOIX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio (MUOIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUOIX achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than FLCPX's 9.95% return.

MUOIX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: 2.96%
• YTD: 2.96%
• 1Y: 12.87%
• 3Y*: 18.76%
• 5Y*: 10.71%
• 10Y*: —

FLCPX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -1.58%
• 6M: 9.95%
• YTD: 9.95%
• 1Y: 21.56%
• 3Y*: 20.54%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: 15.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUOIX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MUOIX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio	2.96%	16.48%	28.61%	18.07%	-20.21%	35.99%	24.20%	36.01%	-11.00%	17.98%
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund	9.95%	17.84%	25.08%	26.25%	-18.06%	28.61%	18.24%	31.59%	-4.38%	21.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MUOIX and FLCPX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.95

The correlation between MUOIX and FLCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MUOIX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUOIX

MUOIX Risk / Return Rank: 19
MUOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MUOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
MUOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
MUOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
MUOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

FLCPX

FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 60
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUOIX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio (MUOIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MUOIX	FLCPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	1.78	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	2.44	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.32	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	2.51	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.52	11.05	-7.53

MUOIX vs. FLCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUOIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the FLCPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUOIX and FLCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MUOIX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUOIX drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than FLCPX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUOIX and FLCPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUOIX	FLCPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.35%	-33.87%	-4.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.75%	-8.89%	-4.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.60%	-18.76%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.92%	-24.40%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.99%	-1.58%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-4.17%	-2.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.79%	2.02%	+1.77%

Volatility

MUOIX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio (MUOIX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) have volatilities of 5.13% and 5.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUOIX	FLCPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.13%	5.01%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.81%	9.95%	+0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.47%	12.54%	+0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.11%	17.18%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.12%	18.15%	+1.97%

MUOIX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUOIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUOIX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison

MUOIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund	0.51%	0.56%	6.11%	7.05%	11.23%	10.38%	3.93%	1.74%	2.18%	1.57%	0.76%
MUOIX Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. US Core Portfolio	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.32%	0.21%	0.04%	0.30%	1.35%	1.50%	0.49%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUOIX and FLCPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, MUOIX and FLCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MUOIX or FLCPX?

MUOIX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to FLCPX (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUOIX dropped -38.35% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.