PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUIFX vs. VITPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUIFX vs. VITPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Fund (MUIFX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUIFX achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly lower than VITPX's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, MUIFX has underperformed VITPX with an annualized return of 14.02%, while VITPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.19% annualized return.


MUIFX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.69%
YTD
6.79%
6M
7.01%
1Y
19.58%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
11.23%
10Y*
14.02%

VITPX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.76%
YTD
11.99%
6M
11.89%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUIFX vs. VITPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUIFX
Nationwide Fund
6.79%14.21%21.61%25.72%-19.09%25.37%22.59%30.95%-6.06%19.79%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.99%17.17%25.43%26.01%-19.48%25.76%20.95%30.87%-5.59%20.51%

Correlation

The correlation between MUIFX and VITPX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2001

0.98

The correlation between MUIFX and VITPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUIFX vs. VITPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUIFX
MUIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MUIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MUIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VITPX
VITPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VITPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VITPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUIFX vs. VITPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Fund (MUIFX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUIFXVITPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

2.47

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

3.37

-0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

3.38

-1.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.24

15.60

-7.35

MUIFX vs. VITPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the VITPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUIFX and VITPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUIFXVITPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.47

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.78

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.83

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.51

+0.03

Drawdowns

MUIFX vs. VITPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUIFX drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, which is greater than VITPX's maximum drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUIFX and VITPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUIFXVITPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.31%

-55.28%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.27%

-8.92%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.71%

-19.35%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-25.31%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.37%

-34.99%

+0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-8.02%

-1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

1.93%

+0.52%

Volatility

MUIFX vs. VITPX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Fund (MUIFX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) have volatilities of 3.01% and 2.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUIFXVITPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

2.94%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

9.19%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.74%

12.19%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

17.35%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.30%

18.41%

-0.11%

MUIFX vs. VITPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUIFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VITPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUIFX vs. VITPX - Dividend Comparison

MUIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.73%, more than VITPX's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUIFX
Nationwide Fund
24.73%26.23%11.10%3.28%4.19%14.53%3.15%2.94%27.39%9.55%4.40%3.85%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.24%2.64%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.38%11.57%2.91%3.93%1.90%2.80%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MUIFX and VITPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MUIFX has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to VITPX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUIFX dropped -58.31% vs VITPX's -55.28%.

VITPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUIFX and VITPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer