PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUD vs. ZIVB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUD vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MUD

1D
-1.42%
1M
-51.85%
YTD
-79.58%
6M
-83.74%
1Y
-93.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZIVB

1D
0.00%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUD vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUD vs. ZIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUD
MUD Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
MUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIVB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUD vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUDZIVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.52

MUD vs. ZIVB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUDZIVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.25

Drawdowns

MUD vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUD drawdown since its inception was -96.24%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUD and ZIVB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUDZIVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.24%

0.00%

-96.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.24%

0.00%

-96.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.32%

0.00%

-50.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

61.84%

Volatility

MUD vs. ZIVB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUDZIVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.98%

0.00%

+65.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.05%

0.00%

+67.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.05%

0.00%

+67.05%

MUD vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUD has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUD vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison

MUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.85%, while ZIVB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
MUD
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares
28.85%9.21%0.47%
ZIVB
-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, MUD is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MUD is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.

MUD has the higher dividend yield at 28.85%, compared with 0.00% for ZIVB.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MUD and 1.35% for ZIVB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUD and ZIVB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer