MUD vs. ZIVB

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

MUD (Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares) and ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. MUD charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ZIVB.

Performance

MUD vs. ZIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MUD

• 1D: -4.98%
• 1M: -8.95%
• 6M: -76.32%
• YTD: -80.49%
• 1Y: -92.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZIVB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.42%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUD vs. ZIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MUD Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares	-18.41%
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF	33.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MUD and ZIVB is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	-0.04

Return for Risk

MUD vs. ZIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUD

MUD Risk / Return Rank: 1
MUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
MUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MUD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
MUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MUD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

ZIVB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUD vs. ZIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) and -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MUD	ZIVB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.23	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-3.70	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.60	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	—	—

Drawdowns

MUD vs. ZIVB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUD drawdown since its inception was -97.03%, which is greater than ZIVB's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUD and ZIVB.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUD	ZIVB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.03%	0.00%	-97.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.41%	0.00%	-96.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.04%	0.00%	-53.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	67.99%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MUD	ZIVB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.59%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.00%	84.61%	-8.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.22%	84.61%	-13.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.22%	84.61%	-13.39%

MUD vs. ZIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUD has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIVB's 1.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUD vs. ZIVB - Dividend Comparison

MUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%, more than ZIVB's 2.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MUD Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares	12.55%	9.21%	0.47%
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF	2.37%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUD and ZIVB in my portfolio?

MUD and ZIVB have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MUD or ZIVB?

On fees, MUD is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUD or ZIVB?

MUD is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUD or ZIVB?

MUD has the higher dividend yield at 12.55%, compared with 2.37% for ZIVB.

What is the main difference between MUD and ZIVB?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MUD and 1.35% for ZIVB.