PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUD vs. YQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUD vs. YQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) and YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUD achieves a -79.58% return, which is significantly lower than YQQQ's -8.94% return.


MUD

1D
-1.42%
1M
-51.85%
YTD
-79.58%
6M
-83.74%
1Y
-93.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YQQQ

1D
0.06%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
-8.94%
6M
-6.62%
1Y
-14.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUD vs. YQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MUD
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares
-79.58%-78.75%19.12%
YQQQ
YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF
-8.94%-9.97%-0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MUD and YQQQ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024

0.58

The correlation between MUD and YQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUD vs. YQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUD
MUD Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
MUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

YQQQ
YQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
YQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
YQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
YQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
YQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUD vs. YQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) and YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUDYQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.53

0.83

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

-0.69

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.52

-1.68

+0.16

MUD vs. YQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUD Sharpe Ratio is -1.42, which is comparable to the YQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUD and YQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUDYQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.42

-1.14

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.25

-0.77

-0.48

Drawdowns

MUD vs. YQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUD drawdown since its inception was -96.24%, which is greater than YQQQ's maximum drawdown of -28.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUD and YQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUDYQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.24%

-28.21%

-68.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.56%

-20.82%

-72.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.24%

-28.17%

-68.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.32%

-14.22%

-36.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

61.84%

8.52%

+53.32%

Volatility

MUD vs. YQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) has a higher volatility of 31.94% compared to YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) at 3.90%. This indicates that MUD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUDYQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.94%

3.90%

+28.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.32%

9.87%

+46.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.98%

12.51%

+53.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.05%

16.26%

+50.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

67.05%

16.26%

+50.79%

MUD vs. YQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUD has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than YQQQ's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUD vs. YQQQ - Dividend Comparison

MUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.85%, less than YQQQ's 31.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MUD
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares
28.85%9.21%0.47%
YQQQ
YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF
31.75%31.71%7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUD and YQQQ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUD has higher volatility (31.94%) compared to YQQQ (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUD dropped -96.24% vs YQQQ's -28.21%.

On 1-year performance, YQQQ leads with -14.25% vs -93.62% for MUD. On fees, MUD is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, YQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YQQQ has performed better with a -14.25% return vs -93.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUD is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YQQQ.

YQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 31.75%, compared with 28.85% for MUD.

MUD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while YQQQ is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MUD and 0.99% for YQQQ.

YQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.14 vs -1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUD and YQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer