PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUD vs. QQQE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MUD vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MUD vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MUD
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares
-24.52%-78.75%19.12%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
-2.88%14.58%-1.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUD achieves a -24.52% return, which is significantly lower than QQQE's -2.88% return.


MUD

1D
-4.70%
1M
16.77%
YTD
-24.52%
6M
-59.85%
1Y
-82.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQE

1D
0.68%
1M
-4.20%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
-2.59%
1Y
13.91%
3Y*
11.84%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MUD vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUD has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MUD vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUD
MUD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUD Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUD vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUDQQQEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.26

0.68

-1.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.97

1.13

-4.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.67

1.16

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

1.14

-2.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.25

4.59

-5.83

MUD vs. QQQE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUD Sharpe Ratio is -1.26, which is lower than the QQQE Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUD and QQQE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUDQQQEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.26

0.68

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.07

0.69

-1.75

Correlation

The correlation between MUD and QQQE is -0.58. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MUD vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison

MUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than QQQE's 0.64% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUD
Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares
7.81%9.21%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.64%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%

Drawdowns

MUD vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUD drawdown since its inception was -89.63%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUD and QQQE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MUDQQQEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.63%

-32.14%

-57.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-89.63%

-12.74%

-76.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.10%

-6.45%

-79.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.31%

-5.22%

-40.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

65.64%

3.16%

+62.48%

Volatility

MUD vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MU Bear 1X Shares (MUD) has a higher volatility of 22.32% compared to Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) at 5.64%. This indicates that MUD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MUDQQQEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.32%

5.64%

+16.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.43%

11.05%

+38.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.07%

20.47%

+44.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.70%

20.32%

+43.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.70%

20.71%

+42.99%