PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUC vs. OWNYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUC vs. OWNYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) and Old Westbury New York Municipal Bond Fund (OWNYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUC achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly higher than OWNYX's 0.38% return.


MUC

1D
0.09%
1M
0.40%
YTD
4.25%
6M
4.67%
1Y
10.73%
3Y*
6.35%
5Y*
-2.59%
10Y*
0.80%

OWNYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.90%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
2.86%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUC vs. OWNYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
4.25%5.96%0.76%7.86%-26.81%7.38%11.85%18.12%-1.86%
OWNYX
Old Westbury New York Municipal Bond Fund
0.38%4.64%0.45%4.24%-5.03%-0.31%3.74%4.95%0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MUC and OWNYX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2018

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUC vs. OWNYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUC
MUC Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUC Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

OWNYX
OWNYX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
OWNYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWNYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWNYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
OWNYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWNYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUC vs. OWNYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) and Old Westbury New York Municipal Bond Fund (OWNYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MUCOWNYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.34

2.51

-1.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.12

3.74

-1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.65

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.39

-0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.69

7.47

-0.78

MUC vs. OWNYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUC Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the OWNYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUC and OWNYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MUCOWNYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.51

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

0.28

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.55

-0.26

Drawdowns

MUC vs. OWNYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUC drawdown since its inception was -48.97%, which is greater than OWNYX's maximum drawdown of -8.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUC and OWNYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUCOWNYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.97%

-8.98%

-39.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.53%

-2.30%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.51%

-3.64%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.29%

-8.98%

-29.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.35%

-1.21%

-15.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

-2.10%

-7.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

0.74%

+0.86%

Volatility

MUC vs. OWNYX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has a higher volatility of 2.41% compared to Old Westbury New York Municipal Bond Fund (OWNYX) at 0.60%. This indicates that MUC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OWNYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUCOWNYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

0.60%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.28%

1.40%

+4.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

1.90%

+6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.50%

3.07%

+8.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.89%

3.29%

+8.60%

MUC vs. OWNYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUC has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than OWNYX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUC vs. OWNYX - Dividend Comparison

MUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, more than OWNYX's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
5.96%6.06%5.62%3.84%5.79%4.27%3.96%3.90%4.99%5.14%5.45%5.46%
OWNYX
Old Westbury New York Municipal Bond Fund
2.39%2.88%2.40%1.99%1.29%1.41%1.76%1.60%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUC and OWNYX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUC has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to OWNYX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUC dropped -48.97% vs OWNYX's -8.98%.

OWNYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUC and OWNYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer