MUC vs. NASDX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX).
MUC is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Feb 27, 1998. NASDX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 18, 2000.
Performance
MUC vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MUC vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund | -0.42% | 5.96% | 0.76% | 7.86% | -26.81% | 7.38% | 11.85% | 18.12% | -9.00% | 6.07% |
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | -9.12% | 21.00% | 36.91% | 54.69% | -32.57% | 27.32% | 48.59% | 38.22% | -1.21% | 31.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUC achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly higher than NASDX's -9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, MUC has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 0.58%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.08% annualized return.
MUC
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- -1.25%
- 1Y
- 3.17%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- -2.41%
- 10Y*
- 0.58%
NASDX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -8.02%
- YTD
- -9.12%
- 6M
- -6.79%
- 1Y
- 19.59%
- 3Y*
- 24.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MUC vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUC has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MUC vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank
MUC
NASDX
MUC vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUC | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.31 | 0.88 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.48 | 1.40 | -0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.20 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 1.31 | -0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | 5.01 | -3.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUC | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 0.88 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.63 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 0.85 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.29 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between MUC and NASDX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MUC vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison
MUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than NASDX's 3.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund | 6.17% | 6.06% | 5.62% | 3.84% | 5.79% | 4.27% | 3.96% | 3.90% | 4.99% | 5.14% | 5.45% | 5.46% |
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares | 3.93% | 3.76% | 16.95% | 7.61% | 3.75% | 2.59% | 1.28% | 7.09% | 2.47% | 1.65% | 0.75% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
MUC vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUC drawdown since its inception was -48.97%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUC and NASDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUC | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.97% | -83.16% | +34.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -12.70% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.29% | -35.33% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.29% | -35.33% | -2.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.09% | -11.90% | -8.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -34.59% | +24.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.32% | -0.43% |
Volatility
MUC vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) is 3.17%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that MUC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MUC | NASDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 5.38% | -2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.80% | 12.45% | -6.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.35% | 22.55% | -12.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.46% | 23.03% | -11.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.89% | 22.61% | -10.72% |