PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUC vs. BDMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUC vs. BDMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUC achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly lower than BDMIX's 13.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MUC has underperformed BDMIX with an annualized return of 0.79%, while BDMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.69% annualized return.


MUC

1D
0.37%
1M
3.06%
YTD
5.84%
6M
6.14%
1Y
12.82%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
-2.30%
10Y*
0.79%

BDMIX

1D
0.06%
1M
3.45%
YTD
13.03%
6M
12.49%
1Y
23.48%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
8.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUC vs. BDMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
5.84%5.96%0.76%7.86%-26.81%7.38%11.85%18.12%-9.00%6.07%
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I
13.03%18.30%21.39%14.55%1.80%3.34%0.29%-0.85%2.20%12.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MUC and BDMIX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUC vs. BDMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUC
MUC Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUC Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

BDMIX
BDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUC vs. BDMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUCBDMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.65

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

7.45

-5.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

21.18

-13.19

MUC vs. BDMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUC Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the BDMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUC and BDMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUC vs. BDMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUC drawdown since its inception was -48.97%, which is greater than BDMIX's maximum drawdown of -11.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUC and BDMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUCBDMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.97%

-11.89%

-37.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.53%

-3.24%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.51%

-4.07%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.29%

-5.99%

-32.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.29%

-9.44%

-28.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.07%

-0.18%

-14.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.91%

-2.67%

-7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.14%

+0.47%

Volatility

MUC vs. BDMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) is 2.16%, while BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that MUC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUCBDMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

2.73%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.35%

4.79%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.18%

7.09%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.51%

6.58%

+4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.89%

5.85%

+6.04%

MUC vs. BDMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUC has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BDMIX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUC vs. BDMIX - Dividend Comparison

MUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, less than BDMIX's 7.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I
7.90%8.94%13.26%7.42%0.00%1.23%0.30%6.78%0.94%0.00%0.00%1.86%
MUC
BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund
5.90%6.06%5.62%3.84%5.79%4.27%3.96%3.90%4.99%5.14%5.45%5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUC and BDMIX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDMIX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to MUC (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUC dropped -48.97% vs BDMIX's -11.89%.

BDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUC and BDMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer