MUC vs. BDJ
MUC (BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund) and BDJ (BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund) are both mutual funds - MUC is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BDJ is a Derivative Income fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, MUC returned 0.79%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for BDJ. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUC charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for BDJ.
Performance
MUC vs. BDJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUC achieves a 5.84% return, which is significantly higher than BDJ's 1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, MUC has underperformed BDJ with an annualized return of 0.79%, while BDJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.
MUC
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 5.84%
- 6M
- 6.14%
- 1Y
- 12.82%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- -2.30%
- 10Y*
- 0.79%
BDJ
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 3.32%
- 1Y
- 18.77%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
MUC vs. BDJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund | 5.84% | 5.96% | 0.76% | 7.86% | -26.81% | 7.38% | 11.85% | 18.12% | -9.00% | 6.07% |
BDJ BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund | 1.80% | 26.12% | 16.87% | -6.67% | 0.83% | 26.56% | -7.58% | 37.43% | -10.42% | 20.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUC and BDJ is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2005 | 0.16 |
The correlation between MUC and BDJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUC vs. BDJ — Risk / Return Rank
MUC
BDJ
MUC vs. BDJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) and BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUC | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 1.54 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 5.59 | +2.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUC vs. BDJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUC drawdown since its inception was -48.97%, smaller than the maximum BDJ drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUC and BDJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUC | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.97% | -59.46% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.53% | -12.28% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.51% | -15.70% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.29% | -21.39% | -16.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.29% | -48.14% | +9.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.07% | -1.80% | -13.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.91% | -8.94% | -0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 3.37% | -1.76% |
Volatility
MUC vs. BDJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) is 2.16%, while BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund (BDJ) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that MUC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUC | BDJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.16% | 3.45% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.35% | 9.49% | -3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.18% | 12.18% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 16.11% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.89% | 18.41% | -6.52% |
MUC vs. BDJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUC has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BDJ's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUC vs. BDJ - Dividend Comparison
MUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, less than BDJ's 9.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDJ BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Fund | 9.23% | 9.03% | 8.21% | 9.49% | 12.18% | 5.95% | 7.08% | 6.66% | 7.21% | 6.07% | 6.88% | 7.36% |
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund | 5.90% | 6.06% | 5.62% | 3.84% | 5.79% | 4.27% | 3.96% | 3.90% | 4.99% | 5.14% | 5.45% | 5.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUC and BDJ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDJ has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to MUC (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUC dropped -48.97% vs BDJ's -59.46%.
MUC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUC and BDJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer