MUB vs. RVNU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU).

MUB and RVNU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MUB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2007. RVNU is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2013. Both MUB and RVNU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

MUB vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MUB vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF	0.04%	3.78%	1.26%	5.56%	-7.34%	1.02%	5.12%	7.06%	0.93%	4.72%
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	1.36%	0.58%	1.46%	11.19%	-16.60%	2.28%	6.54%	10.16%	-0.56%	8.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUB achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 1.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MUB having a 2.00% annualized return and RVNU not far behind at 1.93%.

MUB

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -1.55%
• YTD: 0.04%
• 6M: 1.52%
• 1Y: 4.03%
• 3Y*: 2.67%
• 5Y*: 0.88%
• 10Y*: 2.00%

RVNU

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 6M: 2.16%
• 1Y: 2.94%
• 3Y*: 2.82%
• 5Y*: -0.24%
• 10Y*: 1.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUB vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

RVNU

Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF

MUB

iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF

Return for Risk

MUB vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUB

MUB Risk / Return Rank: 49
MUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
MUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
MUB Omega Ratio Rank: 55
MUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
MUB Martin Ratio Rank: 43

RVNU

RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 22
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 21
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUB vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MUB	RVNU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	0.37	+0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	0.53	+0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.08	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	0.65	+0.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.22	1.55	+2.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MUB vs. RVNU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUB Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the RVNU Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUB and RVNU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MUB	RVNU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	0.37	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	-0.03	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.26	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.37	+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between MUB and RVNU is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MUB vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison

MUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than RVNU's 3.53% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MUB iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF	3.19%	3.14%	3.01%	2.65%	2.11%	1.81%	2.11%	2.42%	2.46%	2.26%	2.21%	2.51%
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF	3.53%	3.46%	3.06%	2.79%	2.81%	2.18%	2.43%	2.75%	2.76%	2.49%	2.72%	3.01%

Drawdowns

MUB vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUB drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUB and RVNU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUB	RVNU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.68%	-23.51%	+9.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.30%	-6.12%	+2.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.88%	-23.51%	+11.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.68%	-23.51%	+9.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.87%	-5.01%	+3.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-4.99%	+2.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	2.57%	-1.53%

Volatility

MUB vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) is 1.56%, while Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a volatility of 2.09%. This indicates that MUB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVNU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUB	RVNU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.56%	2.09%	-0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.07%	3.50%	-1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.15%	7.94%	-3.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.04%	7.16%	-3.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.91%	7.30%	-2.39%