PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUB vs. JMUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUB vs. JMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUB achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than JMUB's 1.46% return.


MUB

1D
0.33%
1M
1.44%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.92%
1Y
6.59%
3Y*
3.28%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
1.95%

JMUB

1D
0.26%
1M
1.37%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.66%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
1.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUB vs. JMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
1.54%3.78%1.26%5.56%-7.34%1.02%5.12%7.06%2.30%
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
1.46%4.34%1.88%5.96%-7.43%1.58%4.98%8.37%2.95%

Correlation

The correlation between MUB and JMUB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2018

0.75

The correlation between MUB and JMUB shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.89 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUB vs. JMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUB
MUB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUB Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

JMUB
JMUB Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
JMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUB vs. JMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUBJMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.53

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

2.28

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.25

7.83

+0.43

MUB vs. JMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUB Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the JMUB Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUB and JMUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUB vs. JMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUB drawdown since its inception was -13.68%, which is greater than JMUB's maximum drawdown of -12.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUB and JMUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUBJMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.68%

-12.50%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-2.55%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.34%

-4.79%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.88%

-12.06%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.40%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-2.50%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.74%

+0.06%

Volatility

MUB vs. JMUB - Volatility Comparison

iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) at 0.69%. This indicates that MUB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUBJMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

0.69%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.27%

1.87%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

2.39%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.07%

3.33%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.92%

4.13%

+0.79%

MUB vs. JMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than JMUB's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MUB vs. JMUB - Dividend Comparison

MUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than JMUB's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
3.59%3.52%3.50%3.20%2.16%1.94%2.13%3.66%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
3.17%3.14%3.01%2.65%2.11%1.81%2.11%2.42%2.46%2.26%2.21%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUB and JMUB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUB has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to JMUB (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUB dropped -13.68% vs JMUB's -12.50%.

On 5-year performance, JMUB leads with 1.23% vs 0.88% for MUB. On fees, MUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMUB has performed better with a 1.23% return vs 0.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JMUB.

JMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 3.17% for MUB.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for MUB and 0.18% for JMUB.

JMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUB and JMUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer