MUA vs. FHMIX
MUA (BlackRock MuniAssets Fund) and FHMIX (Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, MUA returned -3.08%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for FHMIX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUA charges 1.96%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FHMIX.
Performance
MUA vs. FHMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUA achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly higher than FHMIX's 1.11% return.
MUA
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 10.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- 1.68%
FHMIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 2.85%
- 3Y*
- 1.86%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- —
MUA vs. FHMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUA BlackRock MuniAssets Fund | 1.91% | 3.26% | 10.44% | 2.94% | -22.43% | -3.25% |
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund | 1.11% | 3.09% | 1.19% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUA and FHMIX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUA vs. FHMIX — Risk / Return Rank
MUA
FHMIX
MUA vs. FHMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniAssets Fund (MUA) and Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUA | FHMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -10.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 5.69 | -4.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 28.50 | -27.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | 77.58 | -75.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUA | FHMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 3.19 | -2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | 1.45 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 1.44 | -1.10 |
Drawdowns
MUA vs. FHMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUA drawdown since its inception was -43.03%, which is greater than FHMIX's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUA and FHMIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUA | FHMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.03% | -0.50% | -42.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.11% | -0.10% | -10.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.01% | -0.50% | -19.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.03% | -0.50% | -42.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.80% | 0.00% | -18.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -0.06% | -9.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 0.04% | +5.16% |
Volatility
MUA vs. FHMIX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund (MUA) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) at 0.21%. This indicates that MUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUA | FHMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 0.21% | +2.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 0.56% | +7.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 0.89% | +11.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 0.79% | +15.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 0.79% | +15.59% |
MUA vs. FHMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUA has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FHMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUA vs. FHMIX - Dividend Comparison
MUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than FHMIX's 2.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund | 2.80% | 3.04% | 1.18% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUA BlackRock MuniAssets Fund | 6.26% | 6.22% | 6.03% | 4.84% | 6.72% | 5.06% | 4.35% | 4.37% | 5.12% | 4.61% | 5.24% | 5.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUA and FHMIX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUA has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to FHMIX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUA dropped -43.03% vs FHMIX's -0.50%.
FHMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUA and FHMIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer