MTUAY vs. HWM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MTU Aero Engines AG (MTUAY) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM).

Performance

MTUAY vs. HWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MTU Aero Engines AG (MTUAY) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MTUAY vs. HWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MTUAY MTU Aero Engines AG	-13.05%	26.67%	54.85%	1.39%	7.65%	-21.51%	-8.19%	63.25%	1.46%	57.35%
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc.	12.47%	87.95%	102.71%	37.84%	24.16%	11.67%	21.03%	83.54%	-37.43%	48.40%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MTUAY : $19.63B HWM : $93.11B
EPS MTUAY : $16.10 HWM : $3.72
PE Ratio MTUAY : 11.26 HWM : 61.95
PEG Ratio MTUAY : 0.18 HWM : 1.05
PS Ratio MTUAY : 1.24 HWM : 11.32
PB Ratio MTUAY : 4.55 HWM : 17.39
Total Revenue (TTM) MTUAY : $15.80B HWM : $8.25B
Gross Profit (TTM) MTUAY : $3.02B HWM : $2.54B
EBITDA (TTM) MTUAY : $2.53B HWM : $2.38B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTUAY achieves a -13.05% return, which is significantly lower than HWM's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, MTUAY has underperformed HWM with an annualized return of 16.16%, while HWM has yielded a comparatively higher 30.74% annualized return.

MTUAY

• 1D: 7.18%
• 1M: -15.66%
• YTD: -13.05%
• 6M: -21.20%
• 1Y: 5.01%
• 3Y*: 14.21%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: 16.16%

HWM

• 1D: 3.35%
• 1M: -12.22%
• YTD: 12.47%
• 6M: 17.58%
• 1Y: 78.08%
• 3Y*: 76.40%
• 5Y*: 49.01%
• 10Y*: 30.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MTUAY vs. HWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUAY

MTUAY Risk / Return Rank: 44
MTUAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MTUAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MTUAY Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MTUAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
MTUAY Martin Ratio Rank: 46

HWM

HWM Risk / Return Rank: 93
HWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
HWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
HWM Omega Ratio Rank: 91
HWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
HWM Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTUAY vs. HWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MTU Aero Engines AG (MTUAY) and Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTUAY	HWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	2.32	-2.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	2.93	-2.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.40	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.11	4.85	-4.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.38	15.09	-14.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTUAY vs. HWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTUAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the HWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTUAY and HWM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTUAY	HWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	2.32	-2.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	1.56	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.78	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.21	+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between MTUAY and HWM is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MTUAY vs. HWM - Dividend Comparison

MTUAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than HWM's 0.20% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MTUAY MTU Aero Engines AG	0.69%	0.60%	0.66%	1.63%	1.07%	0.73%	1.02%	0.79%	1.11%	1.85%	2.87%	0.00%
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc.	0.20%	0.21%	0.24%	0.31%	0.25%	0.13%	0.05%	0.39%	1.42%	0.88%	40.49%	1.22%

Drawdowns

MTUAY vs. HWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTUAY drawdown since its inception was -64.31%, smaller than the maximum HWM drawdown of -88.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTUAY and HWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTUAY	HWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.31%	-88.30%	+23.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.91%	-16.11%	-12.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.53%	-23.19%	-20.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.31%	-64.81%	+0.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.80%	-13.07%	-10.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.15%	-31.09%	+18.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.59%	5.18%	+3.41%

Volatility

MTUAY vs. HWM - Volatility Comparison

MTU Aero Engines AG (MTUAY) has a higher volatility of 13.39% compared to Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) at 9.88%. This indicates that MTUAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTUAY	HWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.39%	9.88%	+3.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.31%	21.21%	+1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.85%	33.79%	-1.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.42%	31.62%	-0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.13%	39.79%	-4.66%

Financials

MTUAY vs. HWM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MTU Aero Engines AG and Howmet Aerospace Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MTUAY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MTU Aero Engines AG reported a gross profit of 853.63M and revenue of 4.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.8%.

HWM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a gross profit of 683.00M and revenue of 2.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.5%.

MTUAY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MTU Aero Engines AG reported an operating income of 620.37M and revenue of 4.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

HWM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported an operating income of 577.00M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

MTUAY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MTU Aero Engines AG reported a net income of 512.18M and revenue of 4.53B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.

HWM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Howmet Aerospace Inc. reported a net income of 372.00M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.