MTSFY vs. AENA.MC
MTSFY (Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR) and AENA.MC (Aena SA) are both stocks. MTSFY operates in Real Estate - Diversified (Real Estate), while AENA.MC operates in Airports & Air Services (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, MTSFY returned 4.29%/yr vs 54.81%/yr for AENA.MC. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MTSFY vs. AENA.MC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MTSFY is traded in USD, while AENA.MC is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the AENA.MC values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MTSFY achieves a -17.27% return, which is significantly lower than AENA.MC's 14.74% return.
MTSFY
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- 6M
- -21.78%
- YTD
- -17.27%
- 1Y
- 0.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- —
AENA.MC
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 9.13%
- YTD
- 14.74%
- 1Y
- 17.44%
- 3Y*
- 83.81%
- 5Y*
- 54.81%
- 10Y*
- 44.12%
MTSFY vs. AENA.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MTSFY Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR | -17.27% | 43.82% | -0.71% | 34.87% | -7.78% | -8.75% | -11.04% | 11.36% | 4.33% |
AENA.MC Aena SA | 14.74% | 147.84% | 96.05% | 109.36% | -20.14% | -9.52% | -9.22% | 113.20% | 23.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between MTSFY and AENA.MC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2018 | 0.17 |
The correlation between MTSFY and AENA.MC shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MTSFY vs. AENA.MC — Risk / Return Rank
MTSFY
AENA.MC
MTSFY vs. AENA.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY) and Aena SA (AENA.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MTSFY | AENA.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.14 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 0.93 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 1.89 | -1.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MTSFY vs. AENA.MC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MTSFY drawdown since its inception was -52.08%, roughly equal to the maximum AENA.MC drawdown of -50.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTSFY and AENA.MC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MTSFY | AENA.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.08% | -50.48% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.16% | -18.90% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.16% | -18.90% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.16% | -43.29% | +7.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.65% | -6.00% | -26.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.06% | -12.00% | -8.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.03% | 9.31% | +6.72% |
Volatility
MTSFY vs. AENA.MC - Volatility Comparison
Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR (MTSFY) has a higher volatility of 9.10% compared to Aena SA (AENA.MC) at 6.60%. This indicates that MTSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AENA.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MTSFY | AENA.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.10% | 6.60% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.60% | 18.64% | +6.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.87% | 23.88% | +7.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.86% | 54.52% | -24.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.67% | 52.53% | -18.86% |
Dividends
MTSFY vs. AENA.MC - Dividend Comparison
MTSFY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AENA.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AENA.MC Aena SA | 4.05% | 40.97% | 38.80% | 28.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 40.65% | 47.86% | 22.66% | 20.89% |
MTSFY Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR | 0.00% | 0.98% | 1.26% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MTSFY vs. AENA.MC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd ADR and Aena SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MTSFY and AENA.MC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MTSFY and AENA.MC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer