MTRL.L vs. XWIS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MTRL.L (SPDR® MSCI Europe Materials UCITS ETF) and XWIS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP) are both Industrials Equities funds - MTRL.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while XWIS.L tracks the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MTRL.L returned 25.69% vs 19.79% for XWIS.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MTRL.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XWIS.L.

Performance

MTRL.L vs. XWIS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR® MSCI Europe Materials UCITS ETF (MTRL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MTRL.L is traded in EUR, while XWIS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XWIS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRL.L achieves a 17.94% return, which is significantly higher than XWIS.L's 12.39% return.

MTRL.L

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 5.64%
• YTD: 17.94%
• 6M: 21.88%
• 1Y: 25.69%
• 3Y*: 12.34%
• 5Y*: 6.68%
• 10Y*: —

XWIS.L

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 13.37%
• 1Y: 19.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTRL.L vs. XWIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MTRL.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Materials UCITS ETF	17.94%	12.76%	-2.85%	10.26%
XWIS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP	12.39%	10.89%	20.42%	6.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MTRL.L and XWIS.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023	0.46

The correlation between MTRL.L and XWIS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MTRL.L vs. XWIS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTRL.L

MTRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
MTRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
MTRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MTRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MTRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MTRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTRL.L vs. XWIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® MSCI Europe Materials UCITS ETF (MTRL.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTRL.L	XWIS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.39	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.09	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.26	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	2.08	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.85	7.51	+0.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTRL.L vs. XWIS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the XWIS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRL.L and XWIS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTRL.L	XWIS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.39	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	1.23	-0.40

Drawdowns

MTRL.L vs. XWIS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRL.L drawdown since its inception was -32.80%, which is greater than XWIS.L's maximum drawdown of -18.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRL.L and XWIS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTRL.L	XWIS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.80%	-18.83%	-13.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.06%	-9.46%	-3.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-1.08%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-2.34%	-3.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	2.63%	+0.64%

Volatility

MTRL.L vs. XWIS.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR® MSCI Europe Materials UCITS ETF (MTRL.L) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C GBP (XWIS.L) at 4.33%. This indicates that MTRL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XWIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTRL.L	XWIS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.73%	4.33%	+2.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.18%	11.37%	+2.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.01%	14.18%	+2.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.57%	14.78%	+6.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.28%	14.78%	+14.50%

MTRL.L vs. XWIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTRL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XWIS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MTRL.L vs. XWIS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MTRL.L nor XWIS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTRL.L and XWIS.L in my portfolio?

MTRL.L and XWIS.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MTRL.L or XWIS.L?

On fees, MTRL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTRL.L or XWIS.L?

MTRL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XWIS.L.

What is the main difference between MTRL.L and XWIS.L?

MTRL.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XWIS.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for MTRL.L and 0.25% for XWIS.L.