PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTRL.L vs. NDUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTRL.L vs. NDUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR® MSCI Europe Materials UCITS ETF (MTRL.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTRL.L achieves a 17.94% return, which is significantly higher than NDUS.L's 9.13% return.


MTRL.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
5.64%
YTD
17.94%
6M
21.88%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*

NDUS.L

1D
0.22%
1M
0.29%
YTD
9.13%
6M
10.79%
1Y
14.92%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
12.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTRL.L vs. NDUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTRL.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Materials UCITS ETF
17.94%12.76%-2.85%10.37%-7.69%25.61%11.68%23.61%-10.78%16.85%
NDUS.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF
9.13%24.43%14.77%26.46%-15.90%28.50%4.07%34.71%-13.22%15.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MTRL.L and NDUS.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016

0.40

Over the past year, MTRL.L and NDUS.L have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

MTRL.L vs. NDUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MTRL.L
NDUS.L

Basic Materials

99.2%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%
0.3%

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.4%

Energy

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

98.6%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Technology

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Basic Materials

MTRL.L
99.2%
NDUS.L
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MTRL.L
0.8%
NDUS.L
0.3%

Communication Services

MTRL.L

-

NDUS.L
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

MTRL.L

-

NDUS.L
0.4%

Energy

MTRL.L

-

NDUS.L
0.0%

Financial Services

MTRL.L

-

NDUS.L
0.0%

Healthcare

MTRL.L

-

NDUS.L
0.0%

Industrials

MTRL.L

-

NDUS.L
98.6%

Real Estate

MTRL.L

-

NDUS.L
0.0%

Technology

MTRL.L

-

NDUS.L
0.3%

Utilities

MTRL.L

-

NDUS.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTRL.L vs. NDUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTRL.L
MTRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MTRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MTRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

NDUS.L
NDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTRL.L vs. NDUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® MSCI Europe Materials UCITS ETF (MTRL.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTRL.LNDUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.15

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.11

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

4.07

+3.78

MTRL.L vs. NDUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTRL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the NDUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTRL.L and NDUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTRL.LNDUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

0.77

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.68

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.60

+0.22

Drawdowns

MTRL.L vs. NDUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTRL.L drawdown since its inception was -32.80%, smaller than the maximum NDUS.L drawdown of -41.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTRL.L and NDUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTRL.LNDUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.80%

-41.15%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-13.32%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.62%

-18.31%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-29.10%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-2.93%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-6.34%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

3.65%

-0.38%

Volatility

MTRL.L vs. NDUS.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR® MSCI Europe Materials UCITS ETF (MTRL.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Industrials UCITS ETF (NDUS.L) have volatilities of 6.73% and 6.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTRL.LNDUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

6.58%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

15.98%

-1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.01%

19.20%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.57%

18.85%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.28%

19.80%

+9.48%

MTRL.L vs. NDUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MTRL.L and NDUS.L have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MTRL.L vs. NDUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MTRL.L nor NDUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MTRL.L and NDUS.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MTRL.L and NDUS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTRL.L and NDUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer