MTDD.DE vs. XZEB.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MTDD.DE (Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Dist) and XZEB.DE (Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF) are both European Government Bonds funds - MTDD.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Treasury 50bn 7-10 Year Bond while XZEB.DE tracks the FTSE ESG Select EMU Government Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MTDD.DE returned 2.73%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for XZEB.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MTDD.DE charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XZEB.DE.

Performance

MTDD.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Dist (MTDD.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTDD.DE achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly lower than XZEB.DE's 0.20% return.

MTDD.DE

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 0.11%
• 6M: 0.13%
• 1Y: 0.75%
• 3Y*: 2.73%
• 5Y*: -2.13%
• 10Y*: -0.01%

XZEB.DE

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 0.20%
• 6M: 0.18%
• 1Y: -0.32%
• 3Y*: 1.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTDD.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MTDD.DE Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Dist	0.11%	1.75%	1.15%	8.48%	-8.12%
XZEB.DE Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF	0.20%	-0.59%	0.01%	5.77%	-7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MTDD.DE and XZEB.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2022	0.96

The correlation between MTDD.DE and XZEB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MTDD.DE vs. XZEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTDD.DE

MTDD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9
MTDD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MTDD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
MTDD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9
MTDD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MTDD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 10

XZEB.DE

XZEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7
XZEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
XZEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
XZEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6
XZEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
XZEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTDD.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Dist (MTDD.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MTDD.DE	XZEB.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.05	-0.17	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.10	-0.21	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.97	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.06	-0.24	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.16	-0.53	+0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MTDD.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTDD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is higher than the XZEB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTDD.DE and XZEB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MTDD.DE	XZEB.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05	-0.17	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	-0.11	+0.54

Drawdowns

MTDD.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTDD.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, which is greater than XZEB.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTDD.DE and XZEB.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	MTDD.DE	XZEB.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.48%	-13.98%	-8.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.13%	-2.97%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.42%	-4.45%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.65%	-7.28%	-5.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.55%	-8.40%	+2.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	1.33%	+0.20%

Volatility

MTDD.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Dist (MTDD.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.06% compared to Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE) at 1.57%. This indicates that MTDD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XZEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MTDD.DE	XZEB.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.06%	1.57%	+0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.19%	3.45%	+0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.96%	4.14%	+0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.09%	6.32%	+0.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.07%	6.32%	-0.25%

MTDD.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MTDD.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than XZEB.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MTDD.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Dividend Comparison

MTDD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while XZEB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MTDD.DE Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Dist	2.68%	2.68%	1.85%	1.25%	1.45%	1.74%	1.68%	0.83%	0.77%
XZEB.DE Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MTDD.DE and XZEB.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, MTDD.DE and XZEB.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MTDD.DE or XZEB.DE?

On fees, XZEB.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MTDD.DE or XZEB.DE?

XZEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for MTDD.DE.

What is the main difference between MTDD.DE and XZEB.DE?

MTDD.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Treasury 50bn 7-10 Year Bond, while XZEB.DE tracks FTSE ESG Select EMU Government Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for MTDD.DE and 0.15% for XZEB.DE.