PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTDD.DE vs. LYS4.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MTDD.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Dist (MTDD.DE) and Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYS4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTDD.DE achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly higher than LYS4.DE's 0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MTDD.DE has outperformed LYS4.DE with an annualized return of -0.01%, while LYS4.DE has yielded a comparatively lower -0.21% annualized return.


MTDD.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.13%
1Y
0.75%
3Y*
2.73%
5Y*
-2.13%
10Y*
-0.01%

LYS4.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.05%
6M
0.17%
1Y
0.78%
3Y*
2.29%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*
-0.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTDD.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTDD.DE
Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Dist
0.11%1.75%1.15%8.48%-19.28%-2.83%3.93%6.98%1.40%0.91%
LYS4.DE
Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc
0.05%1.96%2.50%2.85%-5.26%-0.98%-0.68%-0.79%-0.48%-1.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MTDD.DE and LYS4.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2012

0.65

The correlation between MTDD.DE and LYS4.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MTDD.DE vs. LYS4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTDD.DE
MTDD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MTDD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTDD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTDD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MTDD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTDD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

LYS4.DE
LYS4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
LYS4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYS4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYS4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LYS4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYS4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTDD.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Dist (MTDD.DE) and Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYS4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTDD.DELYS4.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.09

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

0.44

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.16

1.30

-1.14

MTDD.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTDD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the LYS4.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTDD.DE and LYS4.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTDD.DELYS4.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

0.43

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.16

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

-0.14

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

-0.01

+0.44

Drawdowns

MTDD.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTDD.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, which is greater than LYS4.DE's maximum drawdown of -9.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTDD.DE and LYS4.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTDD.DELYS4.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.48%

-9.86%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.13%

-1.32%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.42%

-1.32%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.18%

-6.58%

-15.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.48%

-9.86%

-12.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.65%

-2.29%

-10.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-2.57%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

0.45%

+1.08%

Volatility

MTDD.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Dist (MTDD.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.06% compared to Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc (LYS4.DE) at 0.46%. This indicates that MTDD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYS4.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTDD.DELYS4.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

0.46%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.19%

1.24%

+2.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96%

1.35%

+3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.09%

1.72%

+5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.07%

1.43%

+4.64%

MTDD.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MTDD.DE and LYS4.DE have an expense ratio of 0.17%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MTDD.DE vs. LYS4.DE - Dividend Comparison

MTDD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while LYS4.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LYS4.DE
Amundi Euro Highest Rated Macro-Weighted Government Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTDD.DE
Amundi Euro Government Bond 7-10Y UCITS ETF Dist
2.68%2.68%1.85%1.25%1.45%1.74%1.68%0.83%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


MTDD.DE and LYS4.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.17% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MTDD.DE and LYS4.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.17% per year.

MTDD.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Treasury 50bn 7-10 Year Bond, while LYS4.DE tracks MTS Mid Price Highest Rated Macro-Weighted 1-3 (EUR).

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTDD.DE and LYS4.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer