PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTX vs. XMAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTX vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTX achieves a -54.94% return, which is significantly lower than XMAG's 12.73% return.


MSTX

1D
-14.41%
1M
-56.02%
YTD
-54.94%
6M
-72.02%
1Y
-95.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XMAG

1D
0.01%
1M
6.69%
YTD
12.73%
6M
13.28%
1Y
24.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTX vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
-54.94%-89.06%9.35%
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
12.73%15.63%-1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTX and XMAG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTX vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTX
MSTX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

XMAG
XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTX vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTXXMAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.39

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

3.39

-4.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

15.15

-16.42

MSTX vs. XMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the XMAG Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTX and XMAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTXXMAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

2.23

-2.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

1.11

-1.53

Drawdowns

MSTX vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTX drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTX and XMAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTXXMAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.66%

-16.17%

-82.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.62%

-7.29%

-89.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.61%

0.00%

-98.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.94%

-2.13%

-67.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

75.26%

1.63%

+73.63%

Volatility

MSTX vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) has a higher volatility of 39.64% compared to Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) at 2.87%. This indicates that MSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTXXMAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.64%

2.87%

+36.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

112.57%

8.65%

+103.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

140.09%

11.10%

+128.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

167.46%

15.12%

+152.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

167.46%

15.12%

+152.34%

MSTX vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTX vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison

MSTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.


PositionTTM20252024
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%41.01%
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
0.46%0.51%0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTX and XMAG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTX has higher volatility (39.64%) compared to XMAG (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTX dropped -98.66% vs XMAG's -16.17%.

On 1-year performance, XMAG leads with 24.62% vs -95.49% for MSTX. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMAG has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XMAG has performed better with a 24.62% return vs -95.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for MSTX.

XMAG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for MSTX.

MSTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for MSTX and 0.35% for XMAG.

XMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTX and XMAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer