MSTX vs. XMAG
MSTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF) and XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while XMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. MSTX is actively managed, while XMAG is passively managed. Over the past year, MSTX returned -95.49% vs 24.62% for XMAG. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMAG.
Performance
MSTX vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTX achieves a -54.94% return, which is significantly lower than XMAG's 12.73% return.
MSTX
- 1D
- -14.41%
- 1M
- -56.02%
- YTD
- -54.94%
- 6M
- -72.02%
- 1Y
- -95.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMAG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 13.28%
- 1Y
- 24.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTX vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | -54.94% | -89.06% | 9.35% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 12.73% | 15.63% | -1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTX and XMAG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTX vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank
MSTX
XMAG
MSTX vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTX | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.39 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 3.39 | -4.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 15.15 | -16.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTX | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | 2.23 | -2.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 1.11 | -1.53 |
Drawdowns
MSTX vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTX drawdown since its inception was -98.66%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTX and XMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTX | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.66% | -16.17% | -82.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.62% | -7.29% | -89.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.61% | 0.00% | -98.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.94% | -2.13% | -67.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 75.26% | 1.63% | +73.63% |
Volatility
MSTX vs. XMAG - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF (MSTX) has a higher volatility of 39.64% compared to Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) at 2.87%. This indicates that MSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTX | XMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.64% | 2.87% | +36.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 112.57% | 8.65% | +103.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.09% | 11.10% | +128.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 167.46% | 15.12% | +152.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 167.46% | 15.12% | +152.34% |
MSTX vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTX vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison
MSTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 41.01% |
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF | 0.46% | 0.51% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTX and XMAG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTX has higher volatility (39.64%) compared to XMAG (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTX dropped -98.66% vs XMAG's -16.17%.
On 1-year performance, XMAG leads with 24.62% vs -95.49% for MSTX. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMAG has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XMAG has performed better with a 24.62% return vs -95.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for MSTX.
XMAG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for MSTX.
MSTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for MSTX and 0.35% for XMAG.
XMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTX and XMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer