MSTW vs. OMAH
MSTW (Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
MSTW vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -16.42% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 5.30% return.
MSTW
- 1D
- -10.09%
- 1M
- -27.42%
- YTD
- -16.42%
- 6M
- -33.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 12.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTW vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | -16.42% | -71.42% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 5.30% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTW and OMAH is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTW vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
MSTW
OMAH
MSTW vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTW | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.92 | 0.75 | -1.67 |
Drawdowns
MSTW vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -81.85%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTW | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.85% | -11.83% | -70.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.11% | -1.97% | -74.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.38% | -1.25% | -53.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.20% | — |
Volatility
MSTW vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTW | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.79% | 8.02% | +80.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.79% | 13.22% | +75.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.79% | 13.22% | +75.57% |
MSTW vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTW vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 219.17%, more than OMAH's 15.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | 219.17% | 106.94% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.33% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTW and OMAH have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTW.
MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 219.17%, compared with 15.33% for OMAH.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTW and 0.95% for OMAH.
Find the right allocation for MSTW and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer