MSTW vs. LQTI
MSTW (Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
MSTW vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -23.56% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.16% return.
MSTW
- 1D
- -8.54%
- 1M
- -36.78%
- YTD
- -23.56%
- 6M
- -41.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTW vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | -23.56% | -71.42% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.16% | 3.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTW and LQTI is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTW vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
MSTW
LQTI
MSTW vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.94 | 0.88 | -1.82 |
Drawdowns
MSTW vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -81.85%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.85% | -3.41% | -78.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.15% | -1.44% | -76.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.49% | -0.88% | -53.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
MSTW vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.01% | 5.10% | +83.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.01% | 5.97% | +83.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.01% | 5.97% | +83.04% |
MSTW vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTW vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 239.64%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.11% | 7.01% |
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | 239.64% | 106.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTW and LQTI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTW.
MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 239.64%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTW and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for MSTW and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer