MSTW vs. LQTI
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI).
MSTW and LQTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MSTW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jul 23, 2025. LQTI is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 11, 2025.
Performance
MSTW vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MSTW vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | -24.52% | -71.42% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | -0.44% | 3.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -24.52% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -0.44% return.
MSTW
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -13.48%
- YTD
- -24.52%
- 6M
- -72.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MSTW vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MSTW vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
MSTW
LQTI
MSTW vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF (MSTW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.00 | 0.90 | -1.90 |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTW and LQTI is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MSTW vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 197.80%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTW Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay ETF | 197.80% | 106.94% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.07% | 7.01% |
Drawdowns
MSTW vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -81.85%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and LQTI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.85% | -3.41% | -78.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.43% | -2.03% | -76.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.47% | -0.78% | -49.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.12% | — |
Volatility
MSTW vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MSTW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.63% | 6.23% | +83.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.63% | 6.11% | +83.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.63% | 6.11% | +83.52% |