PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTW vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTW vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTW achieves a -49.11% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 27.11% return.


MSTW

1D
-5.03%
1M
-9.33%
6M
-47.69%
YTD
-49.11%
1Y
-83.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-84.93%

BITI

1D
3.01%
1M
-2.58%
6M
22.77%
YTD
27.11%
1Y
58.64%
3Y*
-31.77%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-35.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.10M$26.49M$38.71M
$1.36M$1.35M$3.08M

MSTW vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSTW
Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-49.11%-71.40%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
27.11%31.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTW and BITI is -0.85, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

-0.84

The correlation between MSTW and BITI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.85 to -0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTW vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSTW
MSTW Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTW Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTW Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSTW vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTWBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.24

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

2.53

-3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

6.17

-7.52

MSTW vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTW and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTW vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTW drawdown since its inception was -87.29%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTW and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTWBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.29%

-92.16%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.75%

-25.28%

-61.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.46%

-86.12%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.78%

-68.59%

+9.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

63.15%

10.35%

+52.80%

Volatility

MSTW vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (MSTW) has a higher volatility of 21.78% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 9.13%. This indicates that MSTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTWBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.78%

9.13%

+12.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

73.44%

33.31%

+40.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.22%

44.23%

+46.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.37%

52.03%

+38.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.37%

52.03%

+38.34%

MSTW vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTW vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

MSTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 422.50%, more than BITI's 15.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.17%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
MSTW
Roundhill MSTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
422.50%106.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTW and BITI have a correlation of -0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTW has higher volatility (21.78%) compared to BITI (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTW dropped -87.29% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 58.64% vs -83.12% for MSTW. On fees, MSTW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 9.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 58.64% return vs -83.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

MSTW has the higher dividend yield at 422.50%, compared with 15.17% for BITI.

MSTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSTW and 1.03% for BITI.

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTW and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer