PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTR vs. QCOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSTR vs. QCOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Inc (MSTR) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTR achieves a -13.70% return, which is significantly lower than QCOM's 30.40% return. Over the past 10 years, MSTR has outperformed QCOM with an annualized return of 22.02%, while QCOM has yielded a comparatively lower 18.41% annualized return.


MSTR

1D
5.78%
1M
-26.08%
YTD
-13.70%
6M
-19.09%
1Y
-65.75%
3Y*
64.73%
5Y*
16.17%
10Y*
22.02%

QCOM

1D
4.29%
1M
9.99%
YTD
30.40%
6M
24.43%
1Y
45.72%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
18.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTR vs. QCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-13.70%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%172.42%11.65%-2.70%-33.49%
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
30.40%13.84%8.31%35.07%-38.58%22.25%77.08%60.76%-7.59%2.05%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTR and QCOM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 1998

0.33

The correlation between MSTR and QCOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSTR:

$43.79B

QCOM:

$236.71B

EPS

MSTR:

-$40.19

QCOM:

$9.11

PS Ratio

MSTR:

82.21

QCOM:

5.40

PB Ratio

MSTR:

1.19

QCOM:

8.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSTR:

$490.47M

QCOM:

$44.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSTR:

$334.08M

QCOM:

$24.38B

EBITDA (TTM)

MSTR:

$466.93M

QCOM:

$12.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTR vs. QCOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

QCOM
QCOM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTR vs. QCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Inc (MSTR) and QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTRQCOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.23

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

1.39

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

3.08

-4.31

MSTR vs. QCOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTR Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the QCOM Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTR and QCOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTR vs. QCOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTR drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, which is greater than QCOM's maximum drawdown of -86.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTR and QCOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTRQCOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.86%

-86.75%

-13.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.53%

-33.13%

-43.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.42%

-44.23%

-33.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.11%

-44.29%

-39.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.27%

-44.29%

-44.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.32%

-11.71%

-60.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.45%

-32.87%

-53.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.20%

14.90%

+38.30%

Volatility

MSTR vs. QCOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategy Inc (MSTR) is 21.84%, while QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) has a volatility of 26.79%. This indicates that MSTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTRQCOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.84%

26.79%

-4.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.65%

42.38%

+15.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.53%

48.72%

+22.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.56%

41.22%

+49.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.85%

39.31%

+34.54%

Dividends

MSTR vs. QCOM - Dividend Comparison

MSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSTR
Strategy Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
1.63%2.06%2.18%2.18%2.67%1.47%1.69%2.81%4.27%3.50%3.17%3.72%

Financials

MSTR vs. QCOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Strategy Inc and QUALCOMM Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
124.30M
10.60B
(MSTR) Total Revenue
(QCOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTR and QCOM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCOM has higher volatility (26.79%) compared to MSTR (21.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTR dropped -99.86% vs QCOM's -86.75%.

QCOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTR and QCOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer