PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTR vs. DECK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSTR vs. DECK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Inc (MSTR) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTR achieves a -16.29% return, which is significantly lower than DECK's 5.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MSTR has underperformed DECK with an annualized return of 21.08%, while DECK has yielded a comparatively higher 28.25% annualized return.


MSTR

1D
5.61%
1M
-32.19%
YTD
-16.29%
6M
-30.75%
1Y
-66.03%
3Y*
65.16%
5Y*
19.92%
10Y*
21.08%

DECK

1D
1.48%
1M
9.27%
YTD
5.85%
6M
8.42%
1Y
0.47%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
15.25%
10Y*
28.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTR vs. DECK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-16.29%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%172.42%11.65%-2.70%-33.49%
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
5.85%-48.95%82.30%67.46%8.97%27.73%69.83%31.97%59.44%44.88%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTR and DECK is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 1998

0.24

The correlation between MSTR and DECK shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSTR:

$42.47B

DECK:

$15.53B

EPS

MSTR:

-$40.19

DECK:

$6.98

PS Ratio

MSTR:

79.74

DECK:

2.94

PB Ratio

MSTR:

1.16

DECK:

6.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSTR:

$490.47M

DECK:

$5.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSTR:

$334.08M

DECK:

$3.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

MSTR:

$466.93M

DECK:

$1.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTR vs. DECK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

DECK
DECK Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DECK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DECK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTR vs. DECK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Inc (MSTR) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSTRDECKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.04

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

0.01

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

0.03

-1.29

MSTR vs. DECK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTR Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the DECK Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTR and DECK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSTRDECKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.94

0.01

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.35

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.67

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.24

-0.12

Drawdowns

MSTR vs. DECK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTR drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, which is greater than DECK's maximum drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTR and DECK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTRDECKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.86%

-94.36%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.53%

-35.81%

-40.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.42%

-64.35%

-13.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.11%

-64.35%

-19.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.27%

-64.35%

-24.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.15%

-50.82%

-22.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.47%

-40.35%

-46.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.19%

16.94%

+35.25%

Volatility

MSTR vs. DECK - Volatility Comparison

Strategy Inc (MSTR) has a higher volatility of 21.43% compared to Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) at 11.51%. This indicates that MSTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DECK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTRDECKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.43%

11.51%

+9.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.80%

31.06%

+25.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.82%

45.42%

+25.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.87%

43.98%

+46.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.77%

42.47%

+31.30%

Dividends

MSTR vs. DECK - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSTR nor DECK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MSTR vs. DECK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Strategy Inc and Deckers Outdoor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
124.30M
1.12B
(MSTR) Total Revenue
(DECK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTR and DECK have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTR has higher volatility (21.43%) compared to DECK (11.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTR dropped -99.86% vs DECK's -94.36%.

DECK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTR and DECK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer