MSTR vs. CMOP.L
MSTR (Strategy Inc) is a stock, while CMOP.L (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc) is Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity. Over the past 5 years, MSTR returned 19.14%/yr vs 9.72%/yr for CMOP.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSTR vs. CMOP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MSTR is traded in USD, while CMOP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMOP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTR achieves a -18.41% return, which is significantly lower than CMOP.L's 18.96% return.
MSTR
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -30.13%
- YTD
- -18.41%
- 6M
- -29.74%
- 1Y
- -67.62%
- 3Y*
- 63.46%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- 20.92%
CMOP.L
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- 18.96%
- 6M
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 27.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- —
MSTR vs. CMOP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTR Strategy Inc | -18.41% | -47.53% | 358.54% | 346.15% | -74.00% | 40.13% | 172.42% | 11.65% | -2.70% | -34.08% |
CMOP.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc | 18.96% | 16.40% | 4.25% | -8.12% | 14.71% | 27.55% | -4.27% | 5.44% | -8.74% | -16.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTR and CMOP.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2017 | 0.10 |
The correlation between MSTR and CMOP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTR vs. CMOP.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSTR
CMOP.L
MSTR vs. CMOP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Inc (MSTR) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTR | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.30 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 3.00 | -3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 8.37 | -9.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTR vs. CMOP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTR drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, which is greater than CMOP.L's maximum drawdown of -44.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTR and CMOP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTR | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.86% | -44.75% | -55.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.53% | -9.72% | -66.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.42% | -23.45% | -53.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.11% | -26.47% | -57.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.84% | -9.72% | -64.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.45% | -19.67% | -66.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.01% | 3.49% | +49.52% |
Volatility
MSTR vs. CMOP.L - Volatility Comparison
Strategy Inc (MSTR) has a higher volatility of 21.60% compared to Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L) at 5.45%. This indicates that MSTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMOP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTR | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.60% | 5.45% | +16.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.34% | 15.99% | +41.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.15% | 17.85% | +53.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.79% | 21.63% | +69.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.80% | 19.28% | +54.52% |
Dividends
MSTR vs. CMOP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MSTR nor CMOP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTR and CMOP.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MSTR and CMOP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer