PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTQ vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTQ vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTQ achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 44.25% return.


MSTQ

1D
1.90%
1M
-1.94%
6M
8.40%
YTD
9.61%
1Y
19.01%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.98%

USOY

1D
-4.63%
1M
12.58%
6M
35.65%
YTD
44.25%
1Y
35.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$172.73K$136.64K$94.08K
$3.04M$3.28M$3.41M

MSTQ vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSTQ
LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF
9.61%20.57%13.21%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
44.25%-7.93%6.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTQ and USOY is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2024

-0.07

The correlation between MSTQ and USOY shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTQ vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSTQ
MSTQ Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MSTQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSTQ vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTQUSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.39

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.17

4.10

+0.06

MSTQ vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTQ and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTQ vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTQ drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -25.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTQ and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTQUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.05%

-25.51%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

-25.51%

+13.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.83%

-15.60%

+8.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.48%

-7.18%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

8.65%

-4.08%

Volatility

MSTQ vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) is 7.35%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 16.26%. This indicates that MSTQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTQUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

16.26%

-8.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

32.70%

-18.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.60%

35.22%

-17.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

28.35%

-9.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

28.35%

-9.12%

MSTQ vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTQ has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSTQ vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

MSTQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.74%, less than USOY's 59.33% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSTQ
LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF
12.74%13.97%3.72%0.77%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
59.33%104.32%48.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTQ and USOY have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOY has higher volatility (16.26%) compared to MSTQ (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTQ dropped -31.05% vs USOY's -25.51%.

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 35.36% vs 19.01% for MSTQ. On fees, USOY is cheaper at 1.22% per year. On volatility, MSTQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 35.36% return vs 19.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USOY is cheaper with a 1.22% expense ratio, compared with 1.59% for MSTQ.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 59.33%, compared with 12.74% for MSTQ.

MSTQ is categorized as Options Trading, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Little Harbor Advisors and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.59% for MSTQ and 1.22% for USOY.

MSTQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTQ and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer