MSTQ vs. CBOX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MSTQ (LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF) and CBOX (Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MSTQ charges 1.59%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for CBOX.

Performance

MSTQ vs. CBOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) and Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF (CBOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MSTQ

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -1.94%
• 6M: 8.40%
• YTD: 9.61%
• 1Y: 19.01%
• 3Y*: 19.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.98%

CBOX

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.38%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CBOX Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF	$7.65M	$8.56M	$7.13M
MSTQ LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF	$172.73K	$136.64K	$94.08K

MSTQ vs. CBOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MSTQ LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF	6.36%
CBOX Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF	1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTQ and CBOX is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2026	0.08

Return for Risk

MSTQ vs. CBOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSTQ

MSTQ Risk / Return Rank: 40
MSTQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
MSTQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MSTQ Omega Ratio Rank: 38
MSTQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MSTQ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CBOX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSTQ vs. CBOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF (MSTQ) and Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF (CBOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSTQ	CBOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.17	—	—

Drawdowns

MSTQ vs. CBOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTQ drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, which is greater than CBOX's maximum drawdown of -2.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTQ and CBOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTQ	CBOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.05%	-2.90%	-28.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.83%	-2.29%	-4.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.48%	-1.48%	-7.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSTQ	CBOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.35%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.31%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.60%	7.77%	+9.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.23%	7.77%	+11.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.23%	7.77%	+11.46%

MSTQ vs. CBOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTQ has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOX's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTQ vs. CBOX - Dividend Comparison

MSTQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.74%, while CBOX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CBOX Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSTQ LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF	12.74%	13.97%	3.72%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTQ and CBOX in my portfolio?

MSTQ and CBOX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSTQ or CBOX?

On fees, CBOX is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTQ or CBOX?

CBOX is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.59% for MSTQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTQ or CBOX?

MSTQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.74%, compared with 0.00% for CBOX.

What is the main difference between MSTQ and CBOX?

They also come from different issuers: Little Harbor Advisors and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 1.59% for MSTQ and 0.14% for CBOX.