MSTPX vs. DFSMX
MSTPX (Morningstar Municipal Bond Fund) and DFSMX (DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, MSTPX returned 0.90%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for DFSMX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTPX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DFSMX.
Performance
MSTPX vs. DFSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTPX achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly higher than DFSMX's 0.95% return.
MSTPX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- —
DFSMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 2.48%
- 3Y*
- 2.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.70%
- 10Y*
- 1.26%
MSTPX vs. DFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTPX Morningstar Municipal Bond Fund | 1.18% | 2.38% | 2.57% | 5.62% | -7.20% | 1.48% | 5.43% | 6.24% | 2.06% |
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.95% | 2.30% | 2.84% | 2.98% | -0.36% | -0.11% | 0.83% | 1.62% | 0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTPX and DFSMX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018 | 0.31 |
The correlation between MSTPX and DFSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTPX vs. DFSMX — Risk / Return Rank
MSTPX
DFSMX
MSTPX vs. DFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morningstar Municipal Bond Fund (MSTPX) and DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTPX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.66 | 4.16 | -1.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.07 | 8.56 | -4.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 4.46 | -2.76 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 12.85 | -9.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | 76.74 | -66.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTPX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 4.16 | -1.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 2.18 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 1.79 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
MSTPX vs. DFSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTPX drawdown since its inception was -10.90%, which is greater than DFSMX's maximum drawdown of -2.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTPX and DFSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTPX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -2.66% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.08% | -0.20% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.52% | -0.49% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.90% | -1.66% | -9.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -1.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | 0.00% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -0.23% | -2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.36% | 0.03% | +1.33% |
Volatility
MSTPX vs. DFSMX - Volatility Comparison
Morningstar Municipal Bond Fund (MSTPX) has a higher volatility of 0.78% compared to DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFSMX) at 0.14%. This indicates that MSTPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTPX | DFSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 0.14% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.65% | 0.37% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43% | 0.61% | +1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.56% | 0.79% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.83% | 0.77% | +3.06% |
MSTPX vs. DFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTPX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSMX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTPX vs. DFSMX - Dividend Comparison
MSTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than DFSMX's 2.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSMX DFA Short Term Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.36% | 2.08% | 2.80% | 1.94% | 0.63% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 0.95% | 0.94% | 0.95% |
MSTPX Morningstar Municipal Bond Fund | 2.03% | 2.33% | 3.25% | 2.67% | 2.15% | 1.75% | 3.16% | 2.67% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTPX and DFSMX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTPX has higher volatility (0.78%) compared to DFSMX (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTPX dropped -10.90% vs DFSMX's -2.66%.
DFSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTPX and DFSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer