MSTIX vs. CSHZX
MSTIX (MainStay MacKay Short Term Municipal Fund) and CSHZX (MainStay Cushing MLP Premier Fund) are both mutual funds - MSTIX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by New York Life, while CSHZX is a Energy Equities fund managed by New York Life. Over the past 10 years, MSTIX returned 1.64%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for CSHZX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTIX charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for CSHZX.
Performance
MSTIX vs. CSHZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTIX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than CSHZX's 23.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MSTIX has underperformed CSHZX with an annualized return of 1.64%, while CSHZX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.04% annualized return.
MSTIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 3.50%
- 5Y*
- 1.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.64%
CSHZX
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- YTD
- 23.17%
- 6M
- 23.21%
- 1Y
- 25.44%
- 3Y*
- 28.01%
- 5Y*
- 21.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
MSTIX vs. CSHZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTIX MainStay MacKay Short Term Municipal Fund | 0.99% | 4.69% | 2.41% | 3.70% | -3.33% | 0.43% | 2.55% | 2.53% | 1.81% | 1.29% |
CSHZX MainStay Cushing MLP Premier Fund | 23.17% | 3.69% | 41.96% | 15.20% | 24.20% | 38.80% | -28.06% | 12.37% | -12.72% | -8.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTIX and CSHZX is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2010 | 0.01 |
The correlation between MSTIX and CSHZX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.03 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTIX vs. CSHZX — Risk / Return Rank
MSTIX
CSHZX
MSTIX vs. CSHZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay MacKay Short Term Municipal Fund (MSTIX) and MainStay Cushing MLP Premier Fund (CSHZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTIX | CSHZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.94 | 1.28 | +0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 3.53 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.54 | 8.37 | +1.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTIX vs. CSHZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTIX drawdown since its inception was -8.99%, smaller than the maximum CSHZX drawdown of -76.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTIX and CSHZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTIX | CSHZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.99% | -76.00% | +67.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.38% | -6.89% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.83% | -18.32% | +16.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.62% | -19.90% | +14.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.62% | -70.12% | +64.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -5.34% | +4.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.54% | -18.67% | +18.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | 2.90% | -2.49% |
Volatility
MSTIX vs. CSHZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MainStay MacKay Short Term Municipal Fund (MSTIX) is 0.50%, while MainStay Cushing MLP Premier Fund (CSHZX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that MSTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSHZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTIX | CSHZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.50% | 5.37% | -4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.18% | 11.31% | -10.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51% | 14.83% | -13.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.83% | 20.01% | -18.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.58% | 26.29% | -24.71% |
MSTIX vs. CSHZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTIX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHZX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTIX vs. CSHZX - Dividend Comparison
MSTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than CSHZX's 9.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHZX MainStay Cushing MLP Premier Fund | 9.68% | 11.65% | 6.16% | 8.16% | 8.77% | 11.69% | 14.40% | 8.96% | 13.78% | 10.72% | 10.40% | 9.96% |
MSTIX MainStay MacKay Short Term Municipal Fund | 3.28% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 2.85% | 1.38% | 0.85% | 1.37% | 1.76% | 1.48% | 1.28% | 0.87% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTIX and CSHZX have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSHZX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to MSTIX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTIX dropped -8.99% vs CSHZX's -76.00%.
MSTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTIX and CSHZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer