MSTI vs. DFSD
MSTI (Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF) and DFSD (Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTI returned 3.51% vs 3.46% for DFSD. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSTI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for DFSD.
Performance
MSTI vs. DFSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MSTI having a 0.60% return and DFSD slightly higher at 0.61%.
MSTI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFSD
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 3.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTI vs. DFSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTI Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF | 0.60% | 6.33% | 4.84% | 4.13% |
DFSD Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF | 0.61% | 6.59% | 4.60% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTI and DFSD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2023 | 0.66 |
The correlation between MSTI and DFSD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTI vs. DFSD — Risk / Return Rank
MSTI
DFSD
MSTI vs. DFSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF (MSTI) and Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTI | DFSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.37 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.93 | 8.92 | +2.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTI vs. DFSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTI drawdown since its inception was -1.48%, smaller than the maximum DFSD drawdown of -8.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTI and DFSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTI | DFSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -8.45% | +6.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.32% | -1.47% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.52% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -2.03% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | 0.39% | -0.07% |
Volatility
MSTI vs. DFSD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF (MSTI) is 0.52%, while Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF (DFSD) has a volatility of 0.67%. This indicates that MSTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTI | DFSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | 0.67% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.58% | 1.57% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42% | 1.95% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.68% | 2.76% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.68% | 2.76% | -0.08% |
MSTI vs. DFSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSD's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTI vs. DFSD - Dividend Comparison
MSTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than DFSD's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSD Dimensional Short-Duration Fixed Income ETF | 4.20% | 4.12% | 4.81% | 3.89% | 2.12% | 0.11% |
MSTI Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF | 5.35% | 5.40% | 5.48% | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTI and DFSD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFSD has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to MSTI (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTI dropped -1.48% vs DFSD's -8.45%.
On 1-year performance, MSTI leads with 3.51% vs 3.46% for DFSD. On fees, DFSD is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, MSTI has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTI has performed better with a 3.51% return vs 3.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFSD is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MSTI.
MSTI has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 4.20% for DFSD.
They also come from different issuers: Madison and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MSTI and 0.16% for DFSD.
DFSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTI and DFSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer