MSTGX vs. PDRDX
MSTGX (Morningstar Global Income Fund) and PDRDX (Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, MSTGX returned 4.56%/yr vs 6.34%/yr for PDRDX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSTGX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for PDRDX.
Performance
MSTGX vs. PDRDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTGX achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than PDRDX's 13.08% return.
MSTGX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 7.33%
- 1Y
- 12.26%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- —
PDRDX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 13.08%
- 6M
- 13.47%
- 1Y
- 22.26%
- 3Y*
- 11.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 6.46%
MSTGX vs. PDRDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTGX Morningstar Global Income Fund | 6.45% | 12.04% | 5.36% | 11.91% | -11.18% | 8.46% | 3.92% | 19.97% | -3.56% |
PDRDX Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund | 13.08% | 14.63% | 3.09% | 3.22% | -6.19% | 17.30% | 3.97% | 15.02% | -5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTGX and PDRDX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between MSTGX and PDRDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTGX vs. PDRDX — Risk / Return Rank
MSTGX
PDRDX
MSTGX vs. PDRDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morningstar Global Income Fund (MSTGX) and Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund (PDRDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTGX | PDRDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 3.76 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.50 | 16.33 | -4.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTGX | PDRDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 2.42 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.58 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.51 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
MSTGX vs. PDRDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTGX drawdown since its inception was -27.52%, roughly equal to the maximum PDRDX drawdown of -28.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTGX and PDRDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTGX | PDRDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.52% | -28.55% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.38% | -5.88% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.56% | -10.94% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.64% | -19.35% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -1.50% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -5.98% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 1.35% | +0.23% |
Volatility
MSTGX vs. PDRDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Morningstar Global Income Fund (MSTGX) is 2.29%, while Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund (PDRDX) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that MSTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDRDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTGX | PDRDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 2.92% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.89% | 7.67% | -2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.40% | 9.16% | -2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.14% | 11.00% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.84% | 10.80% | +0.04% |
MSTGX vs. PDRDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTGX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than PDRDX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTGX vs. PDRDX - Dividend Comparison
MSTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than PDRDX's 3.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTGX Morningstar Global Income Fund | 2.91% | 2.97% | 6.64% | 6.32% | 8.79% | 10.48% | 2.96% | 4.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDRDX Principal Diversified Real Asset Fund | 3.79% | 4.19% | 2.43% | 2.52% | 12.88% | 6.56% | 0.52% | 2.36% | 3.47% | 2.21% | 2.61% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTGX and PDRDX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDRDX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to MSTGX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTGX dropped -27.52% vs PDRDX's -28.55%.
MSTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTGX and PDRDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer