MSTE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO
MSTE.TO (Harvest MicroStrategy Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and JEPQ.TO (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while JEPQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTE.TO returned -70.30% vs 31.50% for JEPQ.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.TO.
Performance
MSTE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTE.TO achieves a -18.72% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ.TO's 11.05% return.
MSTE.TO
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- -33.05%
- YTD
- -18.72%
- 6M
- -35.79%
- 1Y
- -70.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 11.05%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTE.TO Harvest MicroStrategy Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | -18.72% | -55.56% |
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 11.05% | 11.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTE.TO and JEPQ.TO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MSTE.TO
JEPQ.TO
MSTE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest MicroStrategy Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (MSTE.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTE.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.48 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 4.09 | -4.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 16.35 | -17.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTE.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 2.52 | -3.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | 1.34 | -2.00 |
Drawdowns
MSTE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.35%, which is greater than JEPQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTE.TO and JEPQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTE.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.35% | -20.05% | -60.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.35% | -7.74% | -72.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.73% | -0.43% | -75.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.74% | -3.35% | -36.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.99% | 1.93% | +52.06% |
Volatility
MSTE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest MicroStrategy Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (MSTE.TO) has a higher volatility of 23.42% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO) at 4.05%. This indicates that MSTE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTE.TO | JEPQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.42% | 4.05% | +19.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.85% | 9.87% | +52.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.17% | 12.58% | +64.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.20% | 17.32% | +66.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.20% | 17.32% | +66.88% |
MSTE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTE.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
MSTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 146.69%, more than JEPQ.TO's 10.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ.TO JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 10.00% | 10.34% | 5.50% |
MSTE.TO Harvest MicroStrategy Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 146.69% | 121.40% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTE.TO and JEPQ.TO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JEPQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MSTE.TO.
MSTE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Harvest and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MSTE.TO and 0.35% for JEPQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for MSTE.TO and JEPQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer