MSTE.TO vs. EMCL.NEO
MSTE.TO (Harvest Strategy Inc. Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and EMCL.NEO (Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTE.TO returned -80.38% vs 48.05% for EMCL.NEO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSTE.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTE.TO achieves a -44.46% return, which is significantly lower than EMCL.NEO's 27.52% return.
MSTE.TO
- 1D
- 13.02%
- 1M
- -46.65%
- YTD
- -44.46%
- 6M
- -45.85%
- 1Y
- -80.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMCL.NEO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 27.52%
- 6M
- 28.23%
- 1Y
- 48.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTE.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTE.TO Harvest Strategy Inc. Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | -44.46% | -50.82% |
EMCL.NEO Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF | 27.52% | 17.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTE.TO and EMCL.NEO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025 | 0.36 |
MSTE.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSTE.TO
EMCL.NEO
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
MSTE.TO
EMCL.NEO
Basic Materials
MSTE.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Communication Services
MSTE.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Consumer Cyclical
MSTE.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Consumer Defensive
MSTE.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Energy
MSTE.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Financial Services
MSTE.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Healthcare
MSTE.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Industrials
MSTE.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Real Estate
MSTE.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Utilities
MSTE.TO
-
EMCL.NEO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTE.TO vs. EMCL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
MSTE.TO
EMCL.NEO
MSTE.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Strategy Inc. Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (MSTE.TO) and Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTE.TO | EMCL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.45 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 3.77 | -4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 13.44 | -14.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTE.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -85.33%, which is greater than EMCL.NEO's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTE.TO and EMCL.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTE.TO | EMCL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.33% | -19.73% | -65.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.33% | -13.12% | -72.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.42% | -4.21% | -79.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.66% | -2.58% | -39.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.80% | 3.64% | +54.16% |
Volatility
MSTE.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Strategy Inc. Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (MSTE.TO) has a higher volatility of 31.28% compared to Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF (EMCL.NEO) at 12.66%. This indicates that MSTE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTE.TO | EMCL.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.28% | 12.66% | +18.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.24% | 20.79% | +46.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.89% | 22.52% | +59.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.11% | 22.96% | +63.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.11% | 22.96% | +63.15% |
Dividends
MSTE.TO vs. EMCL.NEO - Dividend Comparison
MSTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 214.66%, more than EMCL.NEO's 10.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EMCL.NEO Global X Enhanced MSCI Emerging Markets Covered Call ETF | 10.15% | 9.86% | 3.10% |
MSTE.TO Harvest Strategy Inc. Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 214.66% | 121.40% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTE.TO and EMCL.NEO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Global X.
Find the right allocation for MSTE.TO and EMCL.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer